From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752125Ab1GGVfk (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2011 17:35:40 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:36746 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751601Ab1GGVfj (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2011 17:35:39 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Martin Schwidefsky Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] [PATCH] include storage keys in hibernation image. Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 23:36:25 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/3.0.0-rc5+; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; ) Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek , Jiri Slaby , Len Brown References: <20110608074523.211912903@de.ibm.com> <201106142250.15041.rjw@sisk.pl> <20110615093629.07f01779@mschwide> In-Reply-To: <20110615093629.07f01779@mschwide> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201107072336.26151.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, June 15, 2011, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:50:14 +0200 > "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: ... > > Well before the preallocation kicked in we don't know which are the relevant > storage keys. The only other option would be to store all of them which I > consider to be a inferior solution. I've been thinking about that recently a bit. Don't we need to restore the keys of the page frames that aren't copied into the image too? Rafael