From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Netes Subject: Re: [PATCH] opensm: Add support for partition enforcement types Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 14:26:26 +0300 Message-ID: <20110710112626.GC8520@localhost.localdomain> References: <4E135D51.3080208@dev.mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E135D51.3080208-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Hal Rosenstock Cc: "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Hi Hal, On 14:52 Tue 05 Jul , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > Partition enforcement types are in, out, and both. > Prior to this support, both was being used so that is the default. > > Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock > --- Now we end up with two parameters for same functionality: no_part_enforce - you define whether the enforcement is disabled or enabled. part_enforcement_type - you define enforcement type: in/out/both. When no_part_enforce is disabled, part_enforcement_type has no meaning. Don't you find it simpler if we had only one option for partition enforcement with 4 options: disabled/in/out/both(default)? -- Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html