From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sascha Hauer Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:46:25 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] clk: Initial feedback for off-SoC slow bus clocks Message-Id: <20110711104625.GH26347@pengutronix.de> List-Id: References: <20110711025344.GA27497@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20110711093124.GA3239@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110711100759.GG26347@pengutronix.de> <20110711102856.GG3239@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20110711102856.GG3239@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:28:56AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:07:59PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:31:24AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:53:44AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > The biggest issue I ran into was that as the clocks are all registered > > > > by name with the API if you've got two instances of the same off-SoC > > > > device in the system you'll not be able to disambiguate between the > > > > clocks it provides. > > > > > > Sigh. That sounds like yet more trash. Obviously whoever thought > > > up that doesn't actually understand clks. > > > > Nope. In the patches Jeremy posted clocks have a name, but this name > > is not meant to be used with clk_get. clk_get is still implemented > > in clkdev, so the matching between clocks and devices is independent > > of the clock name. > > > > In earlier versions of Jeremys patches the clock name was only present > > when debugfs was compiled in and I think it can be changed back to this. > > > > That said the debugfs support (which is not present in Jeremys latest > > series) would break if two clocks with the same name have the same > > parent, because the clock core would try to create to debugfs entries > > with the same name. > > If that's all its for, then can't some other solution for debugfs names > (lets stop calling them clock names to avoid confusion) be found - > such as > > sprintf(debugfsname, "%s@%p", clk->debugfsprefix, clk); > Sounds good. During my tests on i.MX I found it very convenient to have speaking debugfs names, so I vote for this suggestion instead the following ones. > Or how about using something like this: > > $debugfs/clkdev/device/connection -> ../../clk/ > $debugfs/clk/ > > where could just be the address of the struct clk (which > eliminates the need to pass any names in) or some prefix plus an > incrementing identifier, or just an incrementing number. > > I did think about introducing such a scheme along with clkdev (and did > have some code but that's long gone), but without the $debugfs/clk/ bit > being standardized, it wouldn't have worked. > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754258Ab1GKKqc (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2011 06:46:32 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:36701 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753794Ab1GKKqb (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2011 06:46:31 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:46:25 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Grant Likely , patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeremy Kerr , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] clk: Initial feedback for off-SoC slow bus clocks Message-ID: <20110711104625.GH26347@pengutronix.de> References: <20110711025344.GA27497@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20110711093124.GA3239@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110711100759.GG26347@pengutronix.de> <20110711102856.GG3239@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110711102856.GG3239@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> X-Sent-From: Pengutronix Hildesheim X-URL: http://www.pengutronix.de/ X-IRC: #ptxdist @freenode X-Accept-Language: de,en X-Accept-Content-Type: text/plain X-Uptime: 12:40:41 up 19 days, 16:27, 55 users, load average: 0.22, 0.91, 1.14 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:6f8:1178:2:215:17ff:fe12:23b0 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: sha@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:28:56AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:07:59PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:31:24AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:53:44AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > The biggest issue I ran into was that as the clocks are all registered > > > > by name with the API if you've got two instances of the same off-SoC > > > > device in the system you'll not be able to disambiguate between the > > > > clocks it provides. > > > > > > Sigh. That sounds like yet more trash. Obviously whoever thought > > > up that doesn't actually understand clks. > > > > Nope. In the patches Jeremy posted clocks have a name, but this name > > is not meant to be used with clk_get. clk_get is still implemented > > in clkdev, so the matching between clocks and devices is independent > > of the clock name. > > > > In earlier versions of Jeremys patches the clock name was only present > > when debugfs was compiled in and I think it can be changed back to this. > > > > That said the debugfs support (which is not present in Jeremys latest > > series) would break if two clocks with the same name have the same > > parent, because the clock core would try to create to debugfs entries > > with the same name. > > If that's all its for, then can't some other solution for debugfs names > (lets stop calling them clock names to avoid confusion) be found - > such as > > sprintf(debugfsname, "%s@%p", clk->debugfsprefix, clk); > Sounds good. During my tests on i.MX I found it very convenient to have speaking debugfs names, so I vote for this suggestion instead the following ones. > Or how about using something like this: > > $debugfs/clkdev/device/connection -> ../../clk/ > $debugfs/clk/ > > where could just be the address of the struct clk (which > eliminates the need to pass any names in) or some prefix plus an > incrementing identifier, or just an incrementing number. > > I did think about introducing such a scheme along with clkdev (and did > have some code but that's long gone), but without the $debugfs/clk/ bit > being standardized, it wouldn't have worked. > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer) Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:46:25 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 0/6] clk: Initial feedback for off-SoC slow bus clocks In-Reply-To: <20110711102856.GG3239@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20110711025344.GA27497@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20110711093124.GA3239@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110711100759.GG26347@pengutronix.de> <20110711102856.GG3239@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20110711104625.GH26347@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:28:56AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:07:59PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:31:24AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:53:44AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > The biggest issue I ran into was that as the clocks are all registered > > > > by name with the API if you've got two instances of the same off-SoC > > > > device in the system you'll not be able to disambiguate between the > > > > clocks it provides. > > > > > > Sigh. That sounds like yet more trash. Obviously whoever thought > > > up that doesn't actually understand clks. > > > > Nope. In the patches Jeremy posted clocks have a name, but this name > > is not meant to be used with clk_get. clk_get is still implemented > > in clkdev, so the matching between clocks and devices is independent > > of the clock name. > > > > In earlier versions of Jeremys patches the clock name was only present > > when debugfs was compiled in and I think it can be changed back to this. > > > > That said the debugfs support (which is not present in Jeremys latest > > series) would break if two clocks with the same name have the same > > parent, because the clock core would try to create to debugfs entries > > with the same name. > > If that's all its for, then can't some other solution for debugfs names > (lets stop calling them clock names to avoid confusion) be found - > such as > > sprintf(debugfsname, "%s@%p", clk->debugfsprefix, clk); > Sounds good. During my tests on i.MX I found it very convenient to have speaking debugfs names, so I vote for this suggestion instead the following ones. > Or how about using something like this: > > $debugfs/clkdev/device/connection -> ../../clk/ > $debugfs/clk/ > > where could just be the address of the struct clk (which > eliminates the need to pass any names in) or some prefix plus an > incrementing identifier, or just an incrementing number. > > I did think about introducing such a scheme along with clkdev (and did > have some code but that's long gone), but without the $debugfs/clk/ bit > being standardized, it wouldn't have worked. > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |