From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58681) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgxZ8-0002l1-SV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:25:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgxZ2-0006zK-2V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:25:18 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57875) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgxZ1-0006yu-Hb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:25:11 -0400 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6DBP98g028110 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:25:09 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:24:46 +0300 From: Alon Levy Message-ID: <20110713112446.GK28430@bow.tlv.redhat.com> References: <1310478932-25370-1-git-send-email-alevy@redhat.com> <4E1D3EAD.1010600@redhat.com> <20110713085105.GA28430@bow.tlv.redhat.com> <4E1D7744.9090105@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E1D7744.9090105@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv3] async + suspend reworked List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:45:24PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On 07/13/11 10:51, Alon Levy wrote: > >On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 08:43:57AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > >>On 07/12/11 15:55, Alon Levy wrote: > >>>v2->v3: > >>> builds correctly with older and newer spice, and runs with older and newer qxl driver. > >>> fixed update_area_async to not use QXLRect on stack > >>> qxl-render updated to work with update_area_async correctly > >>> reverted change to update_area api - update_area still returns dirty > >>> rects array > >> > >>Hmm? No patch numbers in the subject? That makes the patch order > >>unclear ... > >> > > > >Sorry, I don't understand what you mean? > > The subject line of the patches says just [patch] not [patch > index/total] which makes it hard to figure the patch ordering ... oh, right, forgot -N. > > cheers, > Gerd > >