All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Depending on uClibc configuration variables
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:31:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110713163105.37f42131@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACTFLAO+rT2UEZ+wJ_8ePQwbbG6m9B4SfPtm8chUzkzS_PoKGw@mail.gmail.com>

Le Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:26:22 +0200,
Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com> a ?crit :

> The thing is that I have been teaching new DNS lookup functions to
> libuClibc which will be built depending on a new config variable
> switch. The puropose for this is to make connman build in buildroot,
> and I have it running here already. However, to prevent breakage, I
> would like to depend on this new uClibc configuration directive, so
> people can't select the new package unless they have a recent uClibc
> with this new option selected. How would I do this?

Either we decide that this option doesn't add too much overhead to
uClibc, and we integrate it to the default uClibc configuration we
ship. Or, we create yet another toolchain config knob that connman can
depend on, and which would tune the uClibc configuration when enabled.

What is the binary size impact of having your option enabled in uClibc ?

Regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-13 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-12 23:05 [Buildroot] Depending on uClibc configuration variables Daniel Mack
2011-07-13  7:12 ` Peter Korsgaard
2011-07-13 14:26   ` Daniel Mack
2011-07-13 14:31     ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2011-07-13 14:36       ` Daniel Mack
2011-07-13 16:24         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2011-07-13 16:31           ` Peter Korsgaard
2011-07-13 16:36             ` Daniel Mack
2011-07-13 17:15               ` Peter Korsgaard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110713163105.37f42131@skate \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.