From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753501Ab1GNEv1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:51:27 -0400 Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:35440 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751035Ab1GNEv0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:51:26 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:51:23 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Dave Chinner Cc: Mel Gorman , Linux-MM , LKML , XFS , Christoph Hellwig , Johannes Weiner , Wu Fengguang , Jan Kara , Rik van Riel , Minchan Kim Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Reduce filesystem writeback from page reclaim (again) Message-ID: <20110714045123.GB3203@infradead.org> References: <1310567487-15367-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <20110714003340.GZ23038@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110714003340.GZ23038@dastard> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:33:40AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > patchset. After all, that's what I keep asking for (so we can get > rid of .writepage altogether), and if the numbers don't add up, then > I'll shut up about it. ;) Unfortunately there's a few more users of ->writepage in addition to memory reclaim. The most visible on is page migration, but there's also a write_one_page helper used by a few filesystems that would either need to get a writepage-like callback or a bigger rewrite. I agree that killing of ->writepage would be a worthwhile goal, though. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p6E4pRkw115283 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:51:27 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 1C96F6B884 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:51:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id MRGB0HD01b8fVJ3L for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:51:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:51:23 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Reduce filesystem writeback from page reclaim (again) Message-ID: <20110714045123.GB3203@infradead.org> References: <1310567487-15367-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <20110714003340.GZ23038@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110714003340.GZ23038@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Rik van Riel , Jan Kara , LKML , XFS , Christoph Hellwig , Linux-MM , Mel Gorman , Wu Fengguang , Johannes Weiner , Minchan Kim On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:33:40AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > patchset. After all, that's what I keep asking for (so we can get > rid of .writepage altogether), and if the numbers don't add up, then > I'll shut up about it. ;) Unfortunately there's a few more users of ->writepage in addition to memory reclaim. The most visible on is page migration, but there's also a write_one_page helper used by a few filesystems that would either need to get a writepage-like callback or a bigger rewrite. I agree that killing of ->writepage would be a worthwhile goal, though. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail6.bemta12.messagelabs.com (mail6.bemta12.messagelabs.com [216.82.250.247]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46CA6B007E for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:51:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:51:23 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Reduce filesystem writeback from page reclaim (again) Message-ID: <20110714045123.GB3203@infradead.org> References: <1310567487-15367-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <20110714003340.GZ23038@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110714003340.GZ23038@dastard> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Dave Chinner Cc: Mel Gorman , Linux-MM , LKML , XFS , Christoph Hellwig , Johannes Weiner , Wu Fengguang , Jan Kara , Rik van Riel , Minchan Kim On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:33:40AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > patchset. After all, that's what I keep asking for (so we can get > rid of .writepage altogether), and if the numbers don't add up, then > I'll shut up about it. ;) Unfortunately there's a few more users of ->writepage in addition to memory reclaim. The most visible on is page migration, but there's also a write_one_page helper used by a few filesystems that would either need to get a writepage-like callback or a bigger rewrite. I agree that killing of ->writepage would be a worthwhile goal, though. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org