From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751418Ab1GRX2H (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:28:07 -0400 Received: from oproxy8-pub.bluehost.com ([69.89.22.20]:56387 "HELO oproxy8-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750979Ab1GRX2E (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:28:04 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=qMAlZVwv7CORoCK4jKU4roJ01C7fwcxQ182DYBTrydjir8J3IyjWtT3Lm0r872UP7oQ2Jmj3fM2gXvja3saRTslmLlSKoOmFm22l1e58T7K1BNySFr6/H8M+7Nxk69KQ; Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 07:27:58 +0800 From: Jesse Barnes To: Manoj Iyer Cc: Chris Ball , Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, matsumur@nts.ricoh.co.jp, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: Added quirks for Ricoh 1180:e823 lower base clock frequency Message-ID: <20110719072758.20dd400e@jbarnes-e6510> In-Reply-To: References: <1310419715-13254-1-git-send-email-manoj.iyer@canonical.com> <201107131835.25217.arnd@arndb.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.0; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {10642:box514.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 174.253.240.166 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:54:40 -0500 (CDT) Manoj Iyer wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 13 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> Not much. This card only has a 6MB/s write speed, which is well > >> below what a 50 MHz bus can do. It mgiht be different on a fast > >> eMMC device or a Sandisk Extreme Pro UHS-1 card. > > > > Okay, I see. I think we're good for now, then -- hopefully anyone > > using a UHS card on their laptop will see the printk when wondering > > why their performance isn't great and get in touch with us, and we > > can investigate more then. > > > > I've pushed Manoj's patch to mmc-next for 3.1 now, with the printk > > changes and a stable@ tag. > > > > Thanks Chris! Assuming you can't move the patch into the MMC driver itself, you can add my acked-by for the PCI quirk addition. Thanks, Jesse