From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] [CPUFREQ] EXYNOS4210: Add Support for DVS Lock Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:03:43 +0100 Message-ID: <20110719150343.GD9652@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1309853179-19438-1-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com> <1309853179-19438-5-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com> <20110709034812.GG26900@sirena.org.uk> <04a101cc4519$912ce800$b386b800$%kim@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:55413 "EHLO opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751354Ab1GSPDq (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:03:46 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <04a101cc4519$912ce800$b386b800$%kim@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Kukjin Kim Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, davej@redhat.com, 'Jongpill Lee' , 'SangWook Ju' , 'Jonghwan Choi' On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 04:08:53PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > This feels like something cpufreq should support to at least some extent > > in the core, especially the thing with forcing a particular mode on > > suspend. Not that I have any particularly bright ideas for how > > immediately. > Basically, I agreed, but I also have no idea yet :( > How about to use this for now then let us think the way? Probably just as well. For the suspend stuff we should be able to implement a generic override the governor callback for use in suspend entry easily enough but for other things I'm drawing a blank right now.