All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
	stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] rtc: Fix hrtimer deadlock
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110722151107.e1c9996d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110722091045.476900421@linutronix.de>

On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:12:51 -0000
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:

> Ben reported a lockup related to rtc. The lockup happens due to:
> 
> CPU0                                        CPU1
> 
> rtc_irq_set_state()			    __run_hrtimer()	
>   spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc->irq_task_lock)    rtc_handle_legacy_irq();
> 					      spin_lock(&rtc->irq_task_lock);
>   hrtimer_cancel()
>     while (callback_running);
> 
> So the running callback never finishes as it's blocked on
> rtc->irq_task_lock.  
> 
> Use hrtimer_try_to_cancel() instead and drop rtc->irq_task_lock while
> waiting for the callback. Fix this for both rtc_irq_set_state() and
> rtc_irq_set_freq().
> 
> ...
>
> +static int rtc_update_hrtimer(struct rtc_device *rtc, int enabled)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * We unconditionally cancel the timer here, because otherwise

The comment seems wrong.  If hrtimer_try_to_cancel() fails, we simply
bale out so we did not "unconditionally cancel the timer"?

> +	 * we could run into BUG_ON(timer->state != HRTIMER_STATE_CALLBACK);
> +	 * when we manage to start the timer before the callback
> +	 * returns HRTIMER_RESTART.
> +	 *
> +	 * We cannot use hrtimer_cancel() here as a running callback
> +	 * could be blocked on rtc->irq_task_lock and hrtimer_cancel()
> +	 * would spin forever.
> +	 */
> +	if (hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&rtc->pie_timer) < 0)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	if (enabled) {
> +		ktime_t period = ktime_set(0, NSEC_PER_SEC / rtc->irq_freq);
> +
> +		hrtimer_start(&rtc->pie_timer, period, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * rtc_irq_set_state - enable/disable 2^N Hz periodic IRQs
>   * @rtc: the rtc device
> @@ -651,24 +674,21 @@ int rtc_irq_set_state(struct rtc_device 
>  	int err = 0;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
> +retry:
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc->irq_task_lock, flags);
>  	if (rtc->irq_task != NULL && task == NULL)
>  		err = -EBUSY;
>  	if (rtc->irq_task != task)
>  		err = -EACCES;
> -	if (err)
> -		goto out;
> -
> -	if (enabled) {
> -		ktime_t period = ktime_set(0, NSEC_PER_SEC/rtc->irq_freq);
> -		hrtimer_start(&rtc->pie_timer, period, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> -	} else {
> -		hrtimer_cancel(&rtc->pie_timer);
> +	if (!err) {
> +		if (rtc_update_hrtimer(rtc, enabled) < 0) {
> +			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtc->irq_task_lock, flags);
> +			cpu_relax();
> +			goto retry;
> +		}
> +		rtc->pie_enabled = enabled;

Well this is rather nasty.  Sort of an open-coded expensive spinlock. 
All rather pointless on SMP=n builds, too.

Is there no better way, such as fixing up the locking properly?


  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-22 22:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-22  9:12 [patch 0/3] rtc: Assorted bug fixes Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-22  9:12 ` [patch 1/3] rtc: Handle errors correctly in rtc_irq_set_state() Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-22 22:04   ` Andrew Morton
2011-07-23  7:15     ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-22  9:12 ` [patch 3/3] rtc: Limit frequency Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-22 22:05   ` Andrew Morton
2011-07-22 22:39     ` [stable] " Willy Tarreau
2011-08-05  3:39       ` Joshua Kinard
2011-08-05  9:04         ` John Stultz
2011-08-06  7:28           ` Joshua Kinard
2011-07-23  7:17     ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-22  9:12 ` [patch 2/3] rtc: Fix hrtimer deadlock Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-22 22:11   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-07-23  7:22     ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110722151107.e1c9996d.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.