From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754627Ab1G0PuT (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:50:19 -0400 Received: from s15228384.onlinehome-server.info ([87.106.30.177]:57975 "EHLO mail.x86-64.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751754Ab1G0PuQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:50:16 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:49:57 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Avi Kivity Cc: Borislav Petkov , Ingo Molnar , "Przywara, Andre" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , LKML , "Pohlack, Martin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, AMD: Correct F15h IC aliasing issue Message-ID: <20110727154957.GB19477@aftab> References: <4E2F0498.8050005@zytor.com> <20110726183721.GF32536@aftab> <4E2F09BB.9060605@zytor.com> <4E2F1889.8030708@amd.com> <4E2F90A2.4030409@redhat.com> <20110727062120.GA5272@aftab> <20110727065932.GA16555@elte.hu> <4E2FDAD0.8000809@redhat.com> <20110727153731.GA19477@aftab> <4E30327C.5020509@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E30327C.5020509@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:45:00AM -0400, Avi Kivity wrote: > What about F21h processors? I see you're not checking them. > > Is there any reason the check should not be made based on topology? Because this patch addresses a performance improvement for the F15h microarchitecture - that doesn't have anything to do with cache topology. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach GM: Alberto Bozzo Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551