From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754853Ab1G1Tfo (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:35:44 -0400 Received: from e9.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.139]:50474 "EHLO e9.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752508Ab1G1Tfl (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:35:41 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:34:22 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: LKML , linux-rt-users , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , Jason Wessel Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rt4 Message-ID: <20110728193422.GT2403@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20110728174123.GA10751@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110728183207.GR2403@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 09:05:14PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 07:43:43PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:37:09PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > Dear RT Folks, > > > > > > > > > > I'm pleased to announce the 3.0-rt4 release. > > > > > > > > 3.0-rt5 boots single-CPU under KVM on a 32-bit laptop. Also with "-smp > > > > 2". It even survived a minute or so of rcutorture in both cases. ;-) > > > > > > > > Some weirdness with interactivity -- if the system is idle aside from > > > > rcutorture, the rcutorture.stat_interval console messages don't come > > > > out unless I hit "enter" on the console. But if I run "top", they do > > > > come out regularly. Might well be KVM's fault, except that running > > > > rcutorture on non-rt kernels doesn't exhibit this behavior. > > > > > > Nah, that's my lazy "avoid printing from atomic context" hack :) > > > > Well, then, that does seem to be working... ;-) > > > > Except that these printk()s are from process level -- rcu_torture_stats() > > in kernel/rcutorture.c. > > > > > > I guess I should try RCU_BOOST=y, then... > > > > > > Good luck :) > > > > Compiled without error and has been running rcutorture smp=2 for > > about 30 minutes now. > > Hmm, perhaps it was some weird interaction with NOHZ which is a > separate issue. OK, I guess I have no alternative but to try enabling NOHZ... Thanx, Paul