From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753129Ab1HBKIT (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2011 06:08:19 -0400 Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:50221 "EHLO www.etchedpixels.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751586Ab1HBKIN (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2011 06:08:13 -0400 Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 11:11:17 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: David Rientjes Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Revert needed: udev spewing warnons on common systems in 3.0 Message-ID: <20110802111117.10a73b89@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <20110802005206.GA3832@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <20110801183207.cea89a96.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110802101614.009cdf42@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.0; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > That's obviously wrong since all of the applications that I've cited > that have been fixed to date have been the result of users actually > noticing the printk_once() and emailing me directly to pass it along to > the appropriate parties. I've also found other cases where bugzilla > entries were created based on that single line warning by users, who in > turn get distros and maintainers to convert to the new interface. And what did the users do - they complained to the distribution. > It's quite effective, but there are still some applications that have yet > to be reported, hence the reason for anybody actually hitting this new > WARN_ONCE(). Perhaps the right way to do it would be to file the bugzillas in the key distros instead Actually this raises a more interesting question - would it make sense to have a moderated notification list for poking all the distributions about things like old API expiry >