From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752873Ab1HIII6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2011 04:08:58 -0400 Received: from fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.36]:54856 "EHLO fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752459Ab1HIIIz (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2011 04:08:55 -0400 X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.3.1 Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 17:01:18 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki To: Johannes Weiner Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" , Michal Hocko , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , abrestic@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] memcg: add memory.vmscan_stat Message-Id: <20110809170118.880377f8.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20110809080159.GA32015@redhat.com> References: <20110722171540.74eb9aa7.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20110808124333.GA31739@redhat.com> <20110809083345.46cbc8de.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20110809080159.GA32015@redhat.com> Organization: FUJITSU Co. LTD. X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 10:01:59 +0200 Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 08:33:45AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 14:43:33 +0200 > > Johannes Weiner wrote: > > > On a non-technical note: as Ying Han and I were the other two people > > > working on reclaim and statistics, it really irks me that neither of > > > us were CCd on this. Especially on such a controversial change. > > > > I always drop CC if no reply/review comes. > > There is always the possibility that a single mail in an otherwise > unrelated patch series is overlooked (especially while on vacation ;). > Getting CCd on revisions and -mm inclusion is a really nice reminder. > > Unless there is a really good reason not to (is there ever?), could > you please keep CCs? > Ok, if you want, I'll CC always. I myself just don't like to get 3 copies of mails when I don't have much interests ;) Thanks, -Kame From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail144.messagelabs.com (mail144.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407996B0169 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 04:08:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (unknown [10.0.50.71]) by fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D47C3EE0BC for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 17:08:53 +0900 (JST) Received: from smail (m1 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3519B45DE62 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 17:08:53 +0900 (JST) Received: from s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.91]) by m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01FF545DE5D for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 17:08:53 +0900 (JST) Received: from s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78B51DB804E for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 17:08:52 +0900 (JST) Received: from ml13.s.css.fujitsu.com (ml13.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.240.81.133]) by s1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06541DB804F for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 17:08:52 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 17:01:18 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] memcg: add memory.vmscan_stat Message-Id: <20110809170118.880377f8.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20110809080159.GA32015@redhat.com> References: <20110722171540.74eb9aa7.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20110808124333.GA31739@redhat.com> <20110809083345.46cbc8de.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20110809080159.GA32015@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Johannes Weiner Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" , Michal Hocko , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , abrestic@google.com On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 10:01:59 +0200 Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 08:33:45AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 14:43:33 +0200 > > Johannes Weiner wrote: > > > On a non-technical note: as Ying Han and I were the other two people > > > working on reclaim and statistics, it really irks me that neither of > > > us were CCd on this. Especially on such a controversial change. > > > > I always drop CC if no reply/review comes. > > There is always the possibility that a single mail in an otherwise > unrelated patch series is overlooked (especially while on vacation ;). > Getting CCd on revisions and -mm inclusion is a really nice reminder. > > Unless there is a really good reason not to (is there ever?), could > you please keep CCs? > Ok, if you want, I'll CC always. I myself just don't like to get 3 copies of mails when I don't have much interests ;) Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org