From: Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Batman CPU usage
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 16:37:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201108111637.31233.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJA-1LiDPQ=DZHvibHM95QnqJuqecSH71PMghK6PgQyLjD=rqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
before we proceed any further would you please solve the riddle of *how* you
obtain the CPU usage values ? I have asked this question several times but
could not find any answer in your mails. Maybe it is something obvious I am
missing ?
> Without batman-advanced protocol between the nodes and when all nodes
> are communicating to each other the results for TCP and UDP cpu usage
> were:
>
> A B C (all in communication range)
>
> TCP CPU utilization send local from C to B = 5.85%
> TCP CPU utilzation send local from B to A = 0.90%
> TCP CPU utilization send local from C to A = 5.10%
Why are you not building the same setup ? Comparing 2 different setups to draw
conclusions is a bit weird ..
> CPU load due to batman-adv (from C to B) = 0.19% (1-hop) (which is
> 6.04 - 5.85)
> CPU load due to batman-adv (from B to A) = 0.27% (1-hop) (which is
> 1.127 - 0.90)
> CPU load due to batman-adv (from C to A) = 1.865% (2-hop) (which is
> 8.615 - 5.85 - 0.90)
>
> The CPU load for 2-hop is more than that for 1-hop which is obvious.
> But, shouldn't the individual some of 1-hops (0.19% + 0.27 % = 0.46%)
> be equal to the 2-hop (1.865%).
In your first email you explain that all 3 systems use different hardware
components (800MHz/1000MHz/2000MHz). Adding / subtracting percentage values
based on different hardware is weird too ..
Also, you probably will notice that you obtain different values depending on
which node has to generate the packets. For instance, A -> C won't give you
the same results as C -> A.
> Also, what about the CPU load on the relaying node itself (node B)?
What about it ?
Regards,
Marek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-11 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-10 10:43 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Batman CPU usage Max Ip
2011-08-10 11:13 ` Marek Lindner
2011-08-10 11:50 ` Max Ip
2011-08-10 14:37 ` Marek Lindner
2011-08-11 13:21 ` Max Ip
2011-08-11 14:37 ` Marek Lindner [this message]
2011-08-15 10:02 ` Max Ip
2011-08-15 10:20 ` Sven Eckelmann
2011-08-15 15:33 ` Marek Lindner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201108111637.31233.lindner_marek@yahoo.de \
--to=lindner_marek@yahoo.de \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.