From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751534Ab1HQHoH (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2011 03:44:07 -0400 Received: from mtagate7.uk.ibm.com ([194.196.100.167]:59230 "EHLO mtagate7.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751054Ab1HQHoF (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2011 03:44:05 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 09:43:47 +0200 From: Martin Schwidefsky To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek , Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] [PATCH] include storage keys in hibernation image. Message-ID: <20110817094347.3c106bd9@mschwide> In-Reply-To: <201108161956.47434.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20110816141441.898339466@de.ibm.com> <20110816141541.237704940@de.ibm.com> <201108161956.47434.rjw@sisk.pl> Organization: IBM Corporation X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:56:47 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > On Tuesday, August 16, 2011, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > > From: Martin Schwidefsky > > > > For s390 there is one additional byte associated with each page, > > the storage key. This byte contains the referenced and changed > > bits and needs to be included into the hibernation image. > > If the storage keys are not restored to their previous state all > > original pages would appear to be dirty. This can cause > > inconsistencies e.g. with read-only filesystems. > > > > Cc: Pavel Machek > > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Cc: Jiri Slaby > > Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky > > OK, I don't have any complaints. Do you want me to take this > patch or do you want to push it through the s390 tree? The patch affects the common power management code. At minimum I would like an acked-by to take it into the s390 tree. I would feel more comfortable if you'd take it via the power management tree though. -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.