From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751822Ab1HVPBM (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:01:12 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:25256 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750759Ab1HVPBJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:01:09 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,351,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="40621106" Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:03:01 +0200 From: Samuel Ortiz To: Abhilash K V Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, khilman@ti.com, santosh.shilimkar@ti.com, premi@ti.com, david.woodhouse@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] OMAP3: Remove auto-selection of PMICs Message-ID: <20110822150301.GY4607@sortiz-mobl> References: <1313754573-11498-1-git-send-email-abhilash.kv@ti.com> <1313754573-11498-2-git-send-email-abhilash.kv@ti.com> <1313754573-11498-3-git-send-email-abhilash.kv@ti.com> <1313754573-11498-4-git-send-email-abhilash.kv@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1313754573-11498-4-git-send-email-abhilash.kv@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Anhilash, On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 05:19:33PM +0530, Abhilash K V wrote: > The current implementation almost assumes that only > TWL4030/TWL5030/TWl6030 are (or can be) used with the > OMAP processors. This is, however, not true. I don't like the mfd/Kconfig change. Why would those drivers be only buildable on OMAP processors ? Unless there is a real reason for this, you should fix the drivers instead. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/ From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sameo@linux.intel.com (Samuel Ortiz) Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:03:01 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] OMAP3: Remove auto-selection of PMICs In-Reply-To: <1313754573-11498-4-git-send-email-abhilash.kv@ti.com> References: <1313754573-11498-1-git-send-email-abhilash.kv@ti.com> <1313754573-11498-2-git-send-email-abhilash.kv@ti.com> <1313754573-11498-3-git-send-email-abhilash.kv@ti.com> <1313754573-11498-4-git-send-email-abhilash.kv@ti.com> Message-ID: <20110822150301.GY4607@sortiz-mobl> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Anhilash, On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 05:19:33PM +0530, Abhilash K V wrote: > The current implementation almost assumes that only > TWL4030/TWL5030/TWl6030 are (or can be) used with the > OMAP processors. This is, however, not true. I don't like the mfd/Kconfig change. Why would those drivers be only buildable on OMAP processors ? Unless there is a real reason for this, you should fix the drivers instead. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/