All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] writeback: dirty position control
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:36:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110823143621.GA15820@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314093660.8002.24.camel@twins>

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:01:00PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 11:40 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > - not a factor at all for updating balanced_rate (whether or not we do (2))
> >   well, in this concept: the balanced_rate formula inherently does not
> >   derive the balanced_rate_(i+1) from balanced_rate_i. Rather it's
> >   based on the ratelimit executed for the past 200ms:
> > 
> >           balanced_rate_(i+1) = task_ratelimit_200ms * bw_ratio
> 
> Ok, this is where it all goes funny..

Exactly. This is where it gets confusing and is bone of contention.

> 
> So if you want completely separated feedback loops I would expect
> something like:
> 
> 	balance_rate_(i+1) = balance_rate_(i) * bw_ratio   ; every 200ms
> 

I agree. This makes sense. IOW.
						      write_bw
bdi->dirty_ratelimit_n = bdi->dirty_ratelimit_(n-1) * -------
						      dirty_rate

> The former is a complete feedback loop, expressing the new value in the
> old value (*) with bw_ratio as feedback parameter; if we throttled too
> much, the dirty_rate will have dropped and the bw_ratio will be <1
> causing the balance_rate to drop increasing the dirty_rate, and vice
> versa.

I think you meant.

"if we throttled too much, the dirty_rate will have dropped and the bw_ratio
 will be >1 causing the balance_rate to increase hence increasing the
 dirty_rate, and vice versa."

> 
> (*) which is the form I expected and why I thought your primary feedback
> loop looked like: rate_(i+1) = rate_(i) * pos_ratio * bw_ratio
> 
> With the above balance_rate is an independent variable that tracks the
> write bandwidth. Now possibly you'd want a low-pass filter on that since
> your bw_ratio is a bit funny in the head, but that's another story.
> 
> Then when you use the balance_rate to actually throttle tasks you apply
> your secondary control steering the dirty page count, yielding:
> 
> 	task_rate = balance_rate * pos_ratio
> 
> >   and task_ratelimit_200ms happen to can be estimated from
> > 
> >           task_ratelimit_200ms ~= balanced_rate_i * pos_ratio
> 
> >   We may alternatively record every task_ratelimit executed in the
> >   past 200ms and average them all to get task_ratelimit_200ms. In this
> >   way we take the "superfluous" pos_ratio out of sight :) 
> 
> Right, so I'm not at all sure that makes sense, its not immediately
> evident that <task_ratelimit> ~= balance_rate * pos_ratio. Nor is it
> clear to me why your primary feedback loop uses task_ratelimit_200ms at
> all. 
> 

We I thought that this is evident that.

task_ratelimit = balanced_rate * pos_ratio

What is not evident to me is following.

balanced_rate_(i+1) = task_ratelimit_200ms * pos_ratio.

Instead, like you, I also thought that following is more obivious.

balanced_rate_(i+1) = balanced_rate_(i) * pos_ratio

Thanks
Vivek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] writeback: dirty position control
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:36:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110823143621.GA15820@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314093660.8002.24.camel@twins>

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:01:00PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 11:40 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > - not a factor at all for updating balanced_rate (whether or not we do (2))
> >   well, in this concept: the balanced_rate formula inherently does not
> >   derive the balanced_rate_(i+1) from balanced_rate_i. Rather it's
> >   based on the ratelimit executed for the past 200ms:
> > 
> >           balanced_rate_(i+1) = task_ratelimit_200ms * bw_ratio
> 
> Ok, this is where it all goes funny..

Exactly. This is where it gets confusing and is bone of contention.

> 
> So if you want completely separated feedback loops I would expect
> something like:
> 
> 	balance_rate_(i+1) = balance_rate_(i) * bw_ratio   ; every 200ms
> 

I agree. This makes sense. IOW.
						      write_bw
bdi->dirty_ratelimit_n = bdi->dirty_ratelimit_(n-1) * -------
						      dirty_rate

> The former is a complete feedback loop, expressing the new value in the
> old value (*) with bw_ratio as feedback parameter; if we throttled too
> much, the dirty_rate will have dropped and the bw_ratio will be <1
> causing the balance_rate to drop increasing the dirty_rate, and vice
> versa.

I think you meant.

"if we throttled too much, the dirty_rate will have dropped and the bw_ratio
 will be >1 causing the balance_rate to increase hence increasing the
 dirty_rate, and vice versa."

> 
> (*) which is the form I expected and why I thought your primary feedback
> loop looked like: rate_(i+1) = rate_(i) * pos_ratio * bw_ratio
> 
> With the above balance_rate is an independent variable that tracks the
> write bandwidth. Now possibly you'd want a low-pass filter on that since
> your bw_ratio is a bit funny in the head, but that's another story.
> 
> Then when you use the balance_rate to actually throttle tasks you apply
> your secondary control steering the dirty page count, yielding:
> 
> 	task_rate = balance_rate * pos_ratio
> 
> >   and task_ratelimit_200ms happen to can be estimated from
> > 
> >           task_ratelimit_200ms ~= balanced_rate_i * pos_ratio
> 
> >   We may alternatively record every task_ratelimit executed in the
> >   past 200ms and average them all to get task_ratelimit_200ms. In this
> >   way we take the "superfluous" pos_ratio out of sight :) 
> 
> Right, so I'm not at all sure that makes sense, its not immediately
> evident that <task_ratelimit> ~= balance_rate * pos_ratio. Nor is it
> clear to me why your primary feedback loop uses task_ratelimit_200ms at
> all. 
> 

We I thought that this is evident that.

task_ratelimit = balanced_rate * pos_ratio

What is not evident to me is following.

balanced_rate_(i+1) = task_ratelimit_200ms * pos_ratio.

Instead, like you, I also thought that following is more obivious.

balanced_rate_(i+1) = balanced_rate_(i) * pos_ratio

Thanks
Vivek

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-08-23 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 305+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-06  8:44 [PATCH 0/5] IO-less dirty throttling v8 Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06  8:44 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06  8:44 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06  8:44 ` [PATCH 1/5] writeback: account per-bdi accumulated dirtied pages Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06  8:44   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06  8:44   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06  8:44 ` [PATCH 2/5] writeback: dirty position control Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06  8:44   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06  8:44   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-08 13:46   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-08 13:46     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-08 13:46     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-08 14:11     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-08 14:11       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-08 14:31       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-08 14:31         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-08 14:31         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-08 22:47         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-08 22:47           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-09  9:31           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-09  9:31             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-09  9:31             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-10 12:28             ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-10 12:28               ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-08 14:41       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-08 14:41         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-08 14:41         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-08 23:05         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-08 23:05           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-09 10:32           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-09 10:32             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-09 10:32             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-09 17:20           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-09 17:20             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-09 17:20             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-10 22:34             ` Jan Kara
2011-08-10 22:34               ` Jan Kara
2011-08-11  2:29               ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-11  2:29                 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-11 11:14                 ` Jan Kara
2011-08-11 11:14                   ` Jan Kara
2011-08-16  8:35                   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-16  8:35                     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-12 13:19             ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-12 13:19               ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-10 21:40           ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-10 21:40             ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-16  8:55             ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-16  8:55               ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-11 22:56           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-11 22:56             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-11 22:56             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-12  2:43             ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-12  2:43               ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-12  3:18               ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-12  5:45               ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-12  5:45                 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-12  9:45                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-12  9:45                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-12  9:45                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-12 11:07                   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-12 11:07                     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-12 12:17                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-12 12:17                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-12 12:17                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-12  9:47               ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-12  9:47                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-12  9:47                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-12 11:11                 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-12 11:11                   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-12 12:54           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-12 12:54             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-12 12:54             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-12 12:59             ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-12 12:59               ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-12 13:08               ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-12 13:08                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-12 13:08                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-12 13:04           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-12 13:04             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-12 13:04             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-12 14:20             ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-12 14:20               ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-22 15:38               ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-22 15:38                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-22 15:38                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-23  3:40                 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-23  3:40                   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-23 10:01                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-23 10:01                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-23 10:01                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-23 14:15                     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-23 14:15                       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-23 17:47                       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-23 17:47                         ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-24  0:12                         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-24  0:12                           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-24 16:12                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-24 16:12                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-26  0:18                             ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26  0:18                               ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26  9:04                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-26  9:04                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-26 10:04                                 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 10:04                                   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 10:42                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-26 10:42                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-26 10:52                                     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 10:52                                       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:26                                   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 12:11                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-26 12:11                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-26 12:20                                       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 12:20                                         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 13:13                                         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 13:18                                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-26 13:18                                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-26 13:24                                             ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 13:24                                               ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-24 18:00                           ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-24 18:00                             ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-25  3:19                             ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-25  3:19                               ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-25 22:20                               ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-25 22:20                                 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-26  1:56                                 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26  1:56                                   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26  8:56                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-26  8:56                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-26  9:53                                     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26  9:53                                       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-29 13:12                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-29 13:12                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-29 13:37                               ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-29 13:37                                 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-02 12:16                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-02 12:16                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 12:40                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 12:40                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-24 15:57                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-24 15:57                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-24 15:57                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-25  5:30                         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-25  5:30                           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-23 14:36                     ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2011-08-23 14:36                       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-09  2:08   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-09  2:08     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-16  8:59     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-16  8:59       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06  8:44 ` [PATCH 3/5] writeback: dirty rate control Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06  8:44   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06  8:44   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-09 14:54   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-09 14:54     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-11  3:42     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-11  3:42       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-09 14:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-09 14:57     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-09 14:57     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-10 11:07     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-10 11:07       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-10 16:17       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-10 16:17         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-10 16:17         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-15 14:08         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-15 14:08           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-09 15:50   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-09 15:50     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-09 16:16     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-09 16:16       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-09 16:16       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-09 16:19       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-09 16:19         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-09 16:19         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-10 14:07         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-10 14:07           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-10 14:00       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-10 14:00         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-10 17:10         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-10 17:10           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-15 14:11           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-15 14:11             ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-09 16:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-09 16:56     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-09 16:56     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-10 14:10     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-09 17:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-09 17:02     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-09 17:02     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-10 14:15     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-10 14:15       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06  8:44 ` [PATCH 4/5] writeback: per task dirty rate limit Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06  8:44   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06  8:44   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06 14:35   ` Andrea Righi
2011-08-06 14:35     ` Andrea Righi
2011-08-07  6:19     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-07  6:19       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-08 13:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-08 13:47     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-08 13:47     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-08 14:21     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-08 14:21       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-08 23:32       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-08 23:32         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-08 14:23     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-08 14:23       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-08 14:26       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-08 14:26         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-08 14:26         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-08 22:38         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-08 22:38           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-13 16:28       ` Andrea Righi
2011-08-13 16:28         ` Andrea Righi
2011-08-15 14:21         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-15 14:26           ` Andrea Righi
2011-08-15 14:26             ` Andrea Righi
2011-08-09 17:46   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-09 17:46     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-10  3:29     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-10  3:29       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-10 18:18       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-10 18:18         ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-11  0:55         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-11  0:55           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-09 18:35   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-09 18:35     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-09 18:35     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-10  3:40     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-10  3:40       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-10 10:25       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-10 10:25         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-10 10:25         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-10 11:13         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-10 11:13           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06  8:44 ` [PATCH 5/5] writeback: IO-less balance_dirty_pages() Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06  8:44   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06  8:44   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06 14:48   ` Andrea Righi
2011-08-06 14:48     ` Andrea Righi
2011-08-06 14:48     ` Andrea Righi
2011-08-07  6:44     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-07  6:44       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-07  6:44       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06 16:46   ` Andrea Righi
2011-08-06 16:46     ` Andrea Righi
2011-08-07  7:18     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-07  9:50       ` Andrea Righi
2011-08-07  9:50         ` Andrea Righi
2011-08-09 18:15   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-09 18:15     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-09 18:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-09 18:41       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-09 18:41       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-10  3:22       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-10  3:22         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-10  3:26     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-10  3:26       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-09 19:16   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-09 19:16     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-10  4:33     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-09  2:01 ` [PATCH 0/5] IO-less dirty throttling v8 Vivek Goyal
2011-08-09  2:01   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-09  5:55   ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-09  5:55     ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-09 14:04     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-09 14:04       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-10  7:41       ` Greg Thelen
2011-08-10  7:41         ` Greg Thelen
2011-08-10  7:41         ` Greg Thelen
2011-08-10 18:40         ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-10 18:40           ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-10 18:40           ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-11  3:21   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-11  3:21     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-11 20:42     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-11 20:42       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-11 21:00       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-11 21:00         ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-16  2:20 [PATCH 0/5] IO-less dirty throttling v9 Wu Fengguang
2011-08-16  2:20 ` [PATCH 2/5] writeback: dirty position control Wu Fengguang
2011-08-16  2:20   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-16  2:20   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-16 19:41   ` Jan Kara
2011-08-16 19:41     ` Jan Kara
2011-08-17 13:23     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-17 13:49       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-17 13:49         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-17 20:24       ` Jan Kara
2011-08-17 20:24         ` Jan Kara
2011-08-18  4:18         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-18  4:18           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-18  4:41           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-18  4:41             ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-18 19:16           ` Jan Kara
2011-08-18 19:16             ` Jan Kara
2011-08-24  3:16         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-24  3:16           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-19  2:53   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-19  2:53     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-19  3:25     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-19  3:25       ` Wu Fengguang
     [not found] <CAFdhcLRKvfqBnXCXLwq-Qe1eNAGC-8XJ3BtHpQKzaa3RhHyp6A@mail.gmail.com>
2011-08-17  6:40 ` David Horner
2011-08-17 12:03   ` Jan Kara
2011-08-17 12:35     ` Wu Fengguang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110823143621.GA15820@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arighi@develer.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.