All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] License for patches
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:55:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201108241855.53895.yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <j33814$hoj$1@dough.gmane.org>

Lars, Grant, All,

On Wednesday 24 August 2011 18:14:28 Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2011-08-24, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, August 24, 2011 11:25:20 Lars Reemts wrote:
> 
> >> Which license is relevant for the package specific patches distributed
> >> by buildroot? Formally it must be the GPL.
> >
> > says who ?  i dont see the logic here.
> 
> According to http://buildroot.uclibc.org/:
> 
>   Buildroot is a set of Makefiles and patches [....]
>   
>   Buildroot is [...] licensed under the GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE V2
>   (Or later).
> 
> Seems pretty clear to me: the patches are under the GPL.
> 
> The question is what happens when you combine GPL'd source (the
> patches) with original source that's not under GPL.  It seems like a
> very legitimate question.

The stance I take with crosstool-NG regarding this, is:
 - crosstool-NG by itself is licensed under the GPLv2
 - the documentation is licensed under CC-BY-SAv2.5
 - patches are available under the same license as the project they apply to
 - a few other licenses here and there (kconfig as GLPv2, etc...)
 - the above does not apply to any file with an associated license (embedded
   in the file, or in an accompanying file)

In my opinion, for what it's worth, is that the same should apply to
buildroot:
 - buildroot by itself (Makefiles, and so on...) is GPLv2+
 - patches are available under the same license as the project they apply to
 - and so...

This would indeed need clarification from the buildroot developpers.

Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.

-- 
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
|  Yann E. MORIN  | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software  Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN     |  ___               |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------:  X  AGAINST      |  \e/  There is no  |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL    |   v   conspiracy.  |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-24 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-24 15:25 [Buildroot] License for patches Lars Reemts
2011-08-24 16:05 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-08-24 16:14   ` Grant Edwards
2011-08-24 16:55     ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2011-08-24 20:48       ` Peter Korsgaard
2011-08-24 17:13     ` Mike Frysinger
2011-08-24 17:38       ` Grant Edwards
2011-08-24 18:08         ` Mike Frysinger
2011-08-24 20:47       ` Peter Korsgaard
2011-08-29 12:32         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2011-08-24 16:21   ` Robin Holt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201108241855.53895.yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr \
    --to=yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.