From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyrill Gorcunov Subject: Re: [RFC] fs, proc: Introduce the /proc//map_files/ directory v2 Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 21:21:10 +0400 Message-ID: <20110825172109.GC6387@sun> References: <20110824085329.GL29452@sun> <20110824111806.GA7191@albatros> <20110825082944.GH10030@sun> <20110825170147.GM2803@mtj.dyndns.org> <4E5680D2.1030608@parallels.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E5680D2.1030608@parallels.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Pavel Emelyanov Cc: Tejun Heo , Vasiliy Kulikov , Nathan Lynch , Oren Laadan , Daniel Lezcano , Andrew Morton , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , James Bottomley , LINUXFS-ML , "containers@lists.osdl.org" , Zan Lynx , Andi Kleen List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 09:05:22PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: ... > > > > I would prefer if the filename included both start and end addresses > > so that it matches the first column of /proc/PID/maps and ls'ing the > > directory is more useful. What do other people think? > > Without 0x at the beginning this is not very convenient, but once we add them it no > longer matches the contents of the /proc/pid/maps. > > Just an opinion, do not mind adding to the name. > So Pavel, we can make the names to look as say "3d73a00000-3d73a01000" leaving proc-inode structure unchanged, that's an idea, right? Cyrill