From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mark gross Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 02/11] PM: extend PM QoS with per-device wake-up constraints Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 09:40:10 -0700 Message-ID: <20110826164010.GB9437@gvim.org> References: <20110820062543.GA5011@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <201108232331.54844.rjw@sisk.pl> <20110825103847.GD31154@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <201108251617.31959.rjw@sisk.pl> Reply-To: markgross@thegnar.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-yw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]:47702 "EHLO mail-yw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753849Ab1HZQkO (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:40:14 -0400 Received: by ywf7 with SMTP id 7so2965309ywf.19 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 09:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201108251617.31959.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Mark Brown , Alan Stern , Linux PM mailing list , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Jean Pihet , markgross@thegnar.org On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 04:17:31PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, August 25, 2011, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:31:54PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > Perhaps. Still, that requires some policy to be put into drivers, > > > which I don't think is entirely correct. > > > > So, I don't really have the bandwidth to discuss this properly for at > > least the next week or so - is it possible to find some time in the > > power track at LPC for this? > > I think so, I'm going to add PM QoS to the agenda anyway. > FWIW I'll be there too. --mark