All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>
Cc: "Rowand, Frank" <Frank_Rowand@sonyusa.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.1-rt11
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 20:17:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110830031720.GC2218@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E5BEF21.6040908@am.sony.com>

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:57:21PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 08/26/11 16:55, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 04:58:49PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> >> On 08/13/11 03:53, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Whee, I can skip release announcements too!
> >>>
> >>> So no the subject ain't no mistake its not, 3.0.1-rt11 is there for the
> >>> grabs.
> >>>
> >>> Changes include (including the missing -rt10):
> >>>
> >>>   - hrtimer fix that should make RT_GROUP work again
> >>>   - RCU fixes that should make the RCU stalls go away
> >>>   - fixes SMP=n builds after breaking them in -rt9
> >>
> >> I have a consistent (every boot) hang on boot.  With a few
> >> hacks to get console output, I get the
> >>
> >>   rcu_preempt_state detected stalls on CPUs/tasks
> >>
> >> messages in the attached console log.
> 
> < snip >
> 
> > 
> > Hmmm...  The last few that I have seen that looked like this were
> > due to my messing up rcutorture so that the RCU-boost testing kthreads
> > ran CPU-bound at real-time priority.
> > 
> > Is it possible that something similar is happening on your system?
> > 
> >                                                         Thanx, Paul
> 
> I don't think so.  That would require CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST, correct?
> And that is not set:
> 
> < way big snip >
> 
> >> # CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST is not set
> >> CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT=60
> >> CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_VERBOSE=y
> 
> I'm finally getting back to this today, so I'm starting to learn about
> the RCU stall detector, so maybe I can make some more sense of this.

This condition does not require CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST, rather, my
bug in CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST was one way to make this happen.  Any
condition that prevents RCU_SOFTIRQ from ever executing can cause these
symptoms.

							Thanx, Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-30  3:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-13 10:53 [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.1-rt11 Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-13 11:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-08-13 11:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-13 13:59     ` Mike Galbraith
2011-08-13 14:23       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-13 16:27       ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-08-14  4:23         ` Mike Galbraith
2011-08-16 14:17           ` Nivedita Singhvi
2011-08-16 15:10             ` Mike Galbraith
2011-08-16 15:18               ` Nivedita Singhvi
2011-08-16 19:31               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-08-17  4:28                 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-08-17  5:03                   ` Nivedita Singhvi
2011-08-15 10:09         ` Mike Galbraith
2011-08-14 21:19 ` Clark Williams
2011-08-21  8:30 ` patches/mm-memory-rt.patch can go away Mike Galbraith
2011-08-23 14:12 ` [patch] sched, rt: fix migrate_enable() thinko Mike Galbraith
2011-09-08  2:11   ` Frank Rowand
2011-09-08  4:58     ` Mike Galbraith
2011-08-24 23:58 ` [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.1-rt11 Frank Rowand
2011-08-26 23:55   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-08-29 19:57     ` Frank Rowand
2011-08-30  3:17       ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2011-09-07  2:53     ` Frank Rowand
2011-09-07  3:00       ` Frank Rowand
2011-09-07  3:00         ` Frank Rowand
2011-09-07  6:42       ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-07  9:25       ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-07  9:25         ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-07 10:46         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-07 10:47           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-07 10:57             ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-07 14:01               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-07 16:32                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-07 16:33                 ` Frank Rowand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110830031720.GC2218@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=Frank_Rowand@sonyusa.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=frank.rowand@am.sony.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.