From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lvk.cs.msu.su (lvk-gate.cmc.msu.ru [212.192.248.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.lvk.cs.msu.su", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6936B6F80 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:56:44 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:49:43 +0400 From: Alexander Gordeev To: Kyungmin Park Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] Modifications for DWC OTG since v13 Message-ID: <20110831104943.01d11a55@apollo.gnet> In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/J8+9bCvxNqDJdWP24ThGi_w"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: Pratyush Anand , viresh.kumar@st.com, vipulkumar.samar@st.com, rajeev-dlh.kumar@st.com, bhupesh.sharma@st.com, Tirumala Marri , Pratyush Anand , vipin.kumar@st.com, shiraz.hashim@st.com, Amit.VIRDI@st.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Mark Miesfeld , deepak.sikri@st.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Fushen Chen List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --Sig_/J8+9bCvxNqDJdWP24ThGi_w Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, =D0=92 Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:18:42 +0900 Kyungmin Park =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Pratyush Anand > wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Tirumala Marri wrote: > >> <-----Original Message----- > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> < > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> [Tirumala Marri] We are working on our next release of patches. They > >> should be coming out soon. > > > > Oh, thats great !! > > Actually, I did not get any reply of my previous mail on your patch rel= ease. > > I thought no one is maintaining., and so I sent them with my modificati= ons, > > after testing them in all dev/host/otg mode. > > > > Regards > > Pratyush >=20 > Hi, >=20 > Can you provide the git repo to test? > and I wonder what's the difference between dwc (from you) and dwc3 > (from Felipe Balbi). I think it's dwc targets for usb 2.0 and dwc3 for > usb 3.0. It doesn't look the same. At least, register definitions are quite different. --=20 Alexander --Sig_/J8+9bCvxNqDJdWP24ThGi_w Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJOXdmHAAoJEElrwznyooJbxV8H/ifPFiMdSa8e1jlA4KPzDBpB dG4A+qaJHtXJ/m8QS2DvuYVOA+/QN3Q9VXqgYW8D5UOyt7VesKnzFRtddwXR5sU3 x8XEIao55F6fLbXKmdDCHRJEGTLaASMCjuLlMp0FtMwZKJ5sy4P3vMdhhqbsa5WE 3f0MLGnKKcuOmBIQuxpjO8PeUgdROR1brlbF+HRYd5qfK4HZdDIz7R3bjXDJUs5h z55wxhsmIHsnCVapLvbUPYqP87+iBREbwmbt6Cpgnry306CFKhK2QHp1CcHMnjt+ 5gptWhfjTAIhJYxF0yQeYq+v6+JXVtJHStWuU85UOCMZCBuEYRdUKSAH3ekp5vM= =m0Im -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/J8+9bCvxNqDJdWP24ThGi_w--