From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48878) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qyp4f-0001ci-75 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:59:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qyp4e-0004I5-74 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:59:41 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f45.google.com ([209.85.215.45]:44811) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qyp4e-0004Hs-2X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:59:40 -0400 Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so700404ewy.4 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:59:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:59:34 +0200 From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" Message-ID: <20110831175934.GA17959@zapo> References: <4E5D9570.1030201@codemonkey.ws> <4E5E3789.3010603@codemonkey.ws> <4E5E39DF.3080609@codemonkey.ws> <4E5E4540.5030408@codemonkey.ws> <4E5E5BF3.50801@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E5E5BF3.50801@codemonkey.ws> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add support for r6040 NIC List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, bifferos On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:06:11AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 08/31/2011 09:35 AM, malc wrote: > >On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > > >>Upper case field names are not okay. If you think coding style isn't clear, > >>that's a bug in coding style. > > > >Sez hu? Coding style is garbage that should be thrown out of the window. > >As for looking, yeah, i'm looking at usb with it's lovely hungarian > >fields, should we stampede to "fix" it? > > > >If the one who's going to maintain the code is fine with whatever naming > >is used so be it. > > No. That's how we got into the coding style mess we're in in the > first place. TBH, the codingstyle in QEMU is the least of "problems" we are facing. We've got lack of documentation, lack of tests, lack of contributors, etc, etc. IMO, those bring codingstyle issues into the pretty much neglectable space. I think we should throw out everything from CS beyond the details of spaces and braces. Maybe keep the 80 char limit. We should ofcourse refer to the C and other specs regarding correctness, like the _t thing, but those are not really stylistic issues. Those are bugs. my 5 cents Cheers