From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 10:46:38 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] Help: U-Boot on Nokia RX-51 (aka N900) In-Reply-To: <2265056.NfLL5Fdny9@pali-elitebook> References: <2265056.NfLL5Fdny9@pali-elitebook> Message-ID: <201109011046.38556.marek.vasut@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Thursday, September 01, 2011 10:42:48 AM Pali Roh?r wrote: > Hello, > > U-Boot patches which add support for Nokia RX-51 (aka N900) is here: > http://al.robotfuzz.com/~al/maemo/u-boot/ > > RX-51 has closed 2nd stage bootloader NOLO which can load kernel image from > nand (or usb) to ram and boot it. NOLO also done all HW initializations. > These U-Boot patches for RX-51 add support that builded U-Boot binary can > be loaded and booted by NOLO. So U-Boot will be 3rd bootloader. > > Patches are on top of revision bd2313078114c4b44c4a5ce149af43bcb7fc8854 and > working fine. I rebased these patches on top of u-boot git master > repository, but booting failed. No output on device. Using git bisect I > found that problem appeared at revision > > 561142af20f1fd7b425d9425730014e656defb91 > ARM: implement relocation for ARM V7 (OMAP) > > If I defined CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC U-Boot working and booting fine > up to revision a9aa3926295df759306258e5e24cace414f53b67 > > So problem is that relocation patches broke RX-51 support. Can somebody > help me how to rewrite/port rx-51 patches to work with ARM relocation (do > not forget that U-Boot is loaded by 2nd bootloader to RAM after HW is > initialized by NOLO)? If U-Boot will be working on RX-51 I will prepair > patches for upstreaming. Does NOLO enable MMU ? btw can you post the patches to the ML for review ? Cheers