From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p81Lkf0I041290 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:46:42 -0500 Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:46:40 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] xfs: call xfs_buf_delwri_queue directly Message-ID: <20110901214640.GB4579@infradead.org> References: <20110823082802.335389799@bombadil.infradead.org> <20110823082912.512830398@bombadil.infradead.org> <1314904935.2903.62.camel@doink> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1314904935.2903.62.camel@doink> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Alex Elder Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 02:22:15PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > that the buffer should be queued at unlock time, we now > just put it in the queue right away. Seems reasonable. > Do you know why enqueueing it was delayed before? I don't know why - it's a carryover from IRIX days, so long before my time. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs