From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com ([209.85.161.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QzkQ2-0005kI-8l for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 09:13:34 +0200 Received: by fxg11 with SMTP id 11so2413932fxg.6 for ; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 00:08:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=AIy3qMZ36jvlXbBMkW02kpzM0QBdylexJfpyLIImDOk=; b=BpNXoePeNlUWJzcDMacTCV8fmxwh8U/EpmF1dGZTJeYkcSFQzFP3INqW3NOudUibw9 DYMcjgcQFBA/qW3hgqdtmKhgPf86RA4Yso7gKJIbshfoTSZYrvDB/HhtmZx8odjsqrh4 XvzbQ4tkoEklT+nJayiOjRGLrhNX3MZq8oAY8= Received: by 10.223.91.75 with SMTP id l11mr3175990fam.66.1315033716565; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 00:08:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([94.230.152.246]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l21sm753920fac.8.2011.09.03.00.08.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 03 Sep 2011 00:08:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 09:08:28 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20110903070828.GL3634@jama.jama.net> References: <1314962732.3526.32.camel@mattotaupa> <1314976910.3526.36.camel@mattotaupa> <1314989318.17121.11.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> <201109022129.26555.schnitzeltony@gmx.de> <1315000152.6109.14.camel@mattotaupa> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1315000152.6109.14.camel@mattotaupa> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: Please merge lists openembedded-devel and openembedded-core again. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 07:13:34 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 34033 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Mit9XoPEfICDqq/V" Content-Disposition: inline --Mit9XoPEfICDqq/V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 11:49:10PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > Am Freitag, den 02.09.2011, 23:34 +0200 schrieb Koen Kooi: > > Op 02-09-11 21:29, Andreas M=FCller schreef: > > > On Friday, September 02, 2011 08:48:38 PM Phil Blundell wrote: > > >> On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 17:21 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > > >>> Am Freitag, den 02.09.2011, 14:19 +0100 schrieb Richard Purdie: > > >>>> I do find the split useful... > > >>>=20 > > >>> Hmm, could you please elaborate? > > >>=20 > > >> Not that I'm Richard, but I do find the split useful as well.=20 > > >> Personally I am much less interested in the traffic on the oe-devel > > >> list and I often ignore that one; I've been somewhat tempted to just= =20 > > >> unsubscribe altogether since there doesn't appear to be all that much > > >> of value (to me) going on there. > >=20 > > > I would even prefer having additional meta-oe list separated from > > > oe-dev. > >=20 > > If there's enough need for it, that can get arranged. >=20 > Why should that be needed? Maybe proposals could be explained and backed > up with arguments for a discussion. I don't care if it's all in one list or N > 2 separate lists because I'll be subscribed to all and filter will merge all those e-mails to one folder anyways.. But I see your point that it's harder to decide to which list(s) someone should send his question.. Regards, --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --Mit9XoPEfICDqq/V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk5h0mwACgkQN1Ujt2V2gBzQJgCeNDTwgLFmB1GZVZeM6R2T3qLG S7UAnjD6tfrAN8QNNJGduOzqDghFXRk5 =slt/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Mit9XoPEfICDqq/V--