From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754678Ab1IFOys (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2011 10:54:48 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48708 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754198Ab1IFOyn (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2011 10:54:43 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:51:24 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Andi Kleen Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Andi Kleen , LKML , Andrew Morton , eric.dumazet@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] posix-timers: turn it_signal into it_valid flag Message-ID: <20110906145124.GA15390@redhat.com> References: <1314661157-22173-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <1314661157-22173-4-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <20110904165658.GA23948@redhat.com> <20110904202907.GA3404@redhat.com> <20110906031411.GA24024@alboin.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110906031411.GA24024@alboin.amr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/05, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > I forgot everything I knew about ->it_requeue_pending logic, but it > > seems to me that do_schedule_next_timer()->lock_timer() can find and > > lock successfully the wrong timer. Another thread can do timer_delete() > > and then re-create the timer with the same id. > > Do you mean after my patches or even before? Ah, sorry for confusion. Before. And after. IOW, I think this has nothing to do with your patches. Oleg.