From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 45/62] net: irq: Remove IRQF_DISABLED Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 13:13:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20110907.131325.897937687962213943.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1315383059-3673-1-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com> <1315383059-3673-46-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: perex@perex.cz, dhowells@redhat.com, prakity@marvell.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, chunkeey@googlemail.com, sonic.zhang@analog.com, klaus.kudielka@ieee.org, t.sailer@alumni.ethz.ch, khilman@ti.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, jhovold@gmail.com, cyril@ti.com, rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk, mingo@elte.hu, jpr@f6fbb.org, adobriyan@gmail.com, jreuter@yaina.de, cbe-oss-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, martinez.javier@gmail.com, samuel@sortiz.org, vapier@gentoo.org, grundler@parisc-linux.org, tklauser@distanz.ch, lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, olof@lixom.net, uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org, linux-hams@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, leitao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, blogic@openwrt.org, shawn.guo@linaro.org, nico@fluxnic.net, geoff@infradead.org, jkosina@suse.cz, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, ralph.hem To: yong.zhang0@gmail.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1315383059-3673-46-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppe-linuxppc-embedded-2=m.gmane.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppe-linuxppc-embedded-2=m.gmane.org@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Yong Zhang Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 16:10:42 +0800 > This flag is a NOOP and can be removed now. > > Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang I have the same concerns here as I had for the sparc case. Some of these drivers might be using IRQF_DISABLED to make sure the IRQ cannot be delivered until it is explicitly enabled via an enable_irq() call. How is that being accomodated now? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 13:13:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20110907.131325.897937687962213943.davem@davemloft.net> To: yong.zhang0@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 45/62] net: irq: Remove IRQF_DISABLED From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1315383059-3673-46-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com> References: <1315383059-3673-1-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com> <1315383059-3673-46-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: perex@perex.cz, dhowells@redhat.com, prakity@marvell.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, chunkeey@googlemail.com, sonic.zhang@analog.com, klaus.kudielka@ieee.org, t.sailer@alumni.ethz.ch, khilman@ti.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, jhovold@gmail.com, cyril@ti.com, rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk, mingo@elte.hu, jpr@f6fbb.org, adobriyan@gmail.com, jreuter@yaina.de, cbe-oss-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, martinez.javier@gmail.com, samuel@sortiz.org, vapier@gentoo.org, grundler@parisc-linux.org, tklauser@distanz.ch, lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, olof@lixom.net, uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org, linux-hams@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, leitao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, blogic@openwrt.org, shawn.guo@linaro.org, nico@fluxnic.net, geoff@infradead.org, jkosina@suse.cz, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, ralph.hempel@lantiq.com, jdmason@kudzu.us, joe@perches.com, steve.glendinning@smsc.com, richard.cochran@omicron.at, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Yong Zhang Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 16:10:42 +0800 > This flag is a NOOP and can be removed now. > > Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang I have the same concerns here as I had for the sparc case. Some of these drivers might be using IRQF_DISABLED to make sure the IRQ cannot be delivered until it is explicitly enabled via an enable_irq() call. How is that being accomodated now?