From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756888Ab1IJCBZ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 9 Sep 2011 22:01:25 -0400
Received: from mail-pz0-f42.google.com ([209.85.210.42]:41373 "EHLO
	mail-pz0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1755977Ab1IJCBY (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 9 Sep 2011 22:01:24 -0400
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 10:01:10 +0800
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, Sam Creasey <sammy@sammy.net>,
        Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>,
        Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>,
        linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/62] m64k: irq: Remove IRQF_DISABLED
Message-ID: <20110910020110.GA8696@zhy>
Reply-To: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
References: <1315383059-3673-1-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
 <1315383059-3673-13-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
 <4E683413.6010009@snapgear.com>
 <CAMuHMdVopb8wkUa5rn48_Zp4y33HaXUr0-BGE6N-6p2PAt=hag@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdVopb8wkUa5rn48_Zp4y33HaXUr0-BGE6N-6p2PAt=hag@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 05:05:15PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 05:18, Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com> wrote:
> > On 07/09/11 18:10, Yong Zhang wrote:
> >>
> >> This flag is a NOOP and can be removed now.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang<yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
> >
> > Looks ok to me:
> >
> > Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
> 
> Except for the subject, it's m68k, not m64k ;-)

Sorry for the typo.

> 
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
> 
> Sorry, I missed the introductary email [0/62].

I sent it out, but seems it didn't reach LKML due to the compromise
of kernel.org.

> But do you expect the individual
> maintainers to take these patches, or are you just collecting Acks?

Quoted from Thomas's reply to Ralf (MIPS):
[ We can hold off the "remove the define" patch until 3.2-rc1 and push
it along with everything which hasn't been merged until then.

Alternatively I can pick the whole MIPS bunch as well. I let Ralf
decide. ]

So the same rule here, you can decide it :)

Thanks,
Yong