From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yong Zhang Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/62] m64k: irq: Remove IRQF_DISABLED Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 10:01:10 +0800 Message-ID: <20110910020110.GA8696__2653.53628569773$1315621546$gmane$org@zhy> References: <1315383059-3673-1-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com> <1315383059-3673-13-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com> <4E683413.6010009@snapgear.com> Reply-To: Yong Zhang Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Greg Ungerer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, Sam Creasey , Greg Ungerer , Lucas De Marchi , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 05:05:15PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 05:18, Greg Ungerer wrote: > > On 07/09/11 18:10, Yong Zhang wrote: > >> > >> This flag is a NOOP and can be removed now. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang > > > > Looks ok to me: > > > > Acked-by: Greg Ungerer > > Except for the subject, it's m68k, not m64k ;-) Sorry for the typo. > > Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > > Sorry, I missed the introductary email [0/62]. I sent it out, but seems it didn't reach LKML due to the compromise of kernel.org. > But do you expect the individual > maintainers to take these patches, or are you just collecting Acks? Quoted from Thomas's reply to Ralf (MIPS): [ We can hold off the "remove the define" patch until 3.2-rc1 and push it along with everything which hasn't been merged until then. Alternatively I can pick the whole MIPS bunch as well. I let Ralf decide. ] So the same rule here, you can decide it :) Thanks, Yong