From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:17:23 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7] dreamplug: initial board support. In-Reply-To: <20110913130059.AF1171408E94@gemini.denx.de> References: <20110913130059.AF1171408E94@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <20110913141723.GB24172@titan.lakedaemon.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Albert, On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 03:00:59PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Prafulla, > > In message you wrote: > > > > Let's have Wolfgang's opinion on this, since this not aligned with current > > u-boot development strategy. > > > > May be we can create a separate header file for tracking (unsupported/tobe > > supported) arm machine-types. > > Actually this is for Albert to comment. He is the ARM custodian and > has to live with the results. Wolfgang, Marek Vasut, and I discussed this here [1]. To summarize, by declaring non-mainlined mach_types in the respective board config, an error will be thrown at compile time after mach-types.h is updated to include the mach_type. The other idea is to have a separate file, say mach-types-local.h where all non-mainlined mach-types would be defined. Thoughts? I can do whichever. thx, Jason. [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot at lists.denx.de/msg60921.html