From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p8EEUNdm145442 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:30:23 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:30:21 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: xfs deadlock in stable kernel 3.0.4 Message-ID: <20110914143021.GB28496@infradead.org> References: <1D2B34A7-7BB9-4E4E-9CA2-382C210E125F@profihost.ag> <20110912152133.GA8345@infradead.org> <20110912200543.GA22409@infradead.org> <4E6EF274.7050007@profihost.ag> <20110913205018.GA8543@infradead.org> <4E70571A.80108@profihost.ag> <4E705C42.6020909@profihost.ag> <4E706A90.9080200@profihost.ag> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E706A90.9080200@profihost.ag> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com" , "xfs@oss.sgi.com" , aelder@sgi.com On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:49:20AM +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: > >Sadly it was now crashing with 3.1 rc-6 + patch again. Sorry i was to > >fast to write you an email. > > So might it be that the problem at least in 3.1 lies in: > [] ? mark_held_locks+0xc9/0xef > [] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3f/0x47 > > and not in XFS? That's the lockdep code. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs