From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roman Mamedov Subject: Re: Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:03:51 +0600 Message-ID: <20110926130351.63adc330@natsu> References: <09f356fa46129bd08dd45752c0f736de.squirrel@www.maxstr.com> <20110926145248.6ffc5f02@notabene.brown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/B.kaW=U+UMXGE/_sGoLBNEa"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110926145248.6ffc5f02@notabene.brown> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: NeilBrown Cc: kenn@kenn.us, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids --Sig_/B.kaW=U+UMXGE/_sGoLBNEa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:52:48 +1000 NeilBrown wrote: > On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 21:23:31 -0700 "Kenn" wrote: >=20 > > I have a raid5 array that had a drive drop out, and resilvered the wrong > > drive when I put it back in, corrupting and destroying the raid. I > > stopped the array at less than 1% resilvering and I'm in the process of > > making a dd-copy of the drive to recover the files. >=20 > I don't know what you mean by "resilvered". At first I thought the initial poster just invented some peculiar funny wor= d of his own, but it looks like it's from the ZFS circles: https://encrypted.google.com/search?q=3Dresilver+zfs @Kenn; you probably mean 'resync' or 'rebuild', but no one ever calls those= processes 'resilver' here, you'll get no google results and blank/unknowin= g/funny looks from people when using that term in relation to mdadm. --=20 With respect, Roman --Sig_/B.kaW=U+UMXGE/_sGoLBNEa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk6AI9cACgkQTLKSvz+PZwhdhgCeMEDJMGiLYk5tldhV1RtwGCjH xwQAmwS+YmGJzn20k04TpRd9ahSJxNoX =HjY1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/B.kaW=U+UMXGE/_sGoLBNEa--