From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ey0-f175.google.com ([209.85.215.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R9gUO-00073N-VG for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:03:09 +0200 Received: by eya25 with SMTP id 25so1350657eya.6 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:57:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=5Kf8BcsK+sudGVw6T9eJPfobJGI/NDM5kCDZ1LzJgDM=; b=ZO2H2JNFYk6udV5VvWTbuQYeLEk3rXPbo8UMOXgDCN1pyfnDD28prpmGv0HYU1v3qd 17MNs3Eat/96kxt5vN7bA5T3s5QNRnNCWbOG7NFW3I4eyBAtRLNpF8Mm+1bKh9KgI6PD 7HVyY4I3gnwaVaWzeqVO874va+wNnLioCR0gw= Received: by 10.223.10.22 with SMTP id n22mr537046fan.144.1317401398494; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:49:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([94.230.152.246]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f10sm7405554fac.14.2011.09.30.09.49.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:49:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:49:51 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Message-ID: <20110930164951.GC7364@jama.jama.net> References: <1317401191.12332.213.camel@ted> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1317401191.12332.213.camel@ted> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [WIP][PATCH 0/9] Glib related upgrades X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:03:09 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 10324 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KDt/GgjP6HVcx58l" Content-Disposition: inline --KDt/GgjP6HVcx58l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 05:46:24PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 17:43 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > We were using 2.29.3+git% from meta-oe and after upgrade to 2.30.0 I wa= s hit=20 > > by few G_CONST_RETURN and other issues due to newer glib. Here is what = I have > > now to build shr images OK again, but probably there is more recipes wh= ich need > > upgrade/fix to cope with glib-2.30.0. > >=20 > > Someone who cares about gnome should continue from this, but IMHO this = is good start :). >=20 > These are marked as WIP. Does this mean they are ready to be taken or is > there a reason to hold off these patches? Marked as WIP as I've tested them only on images I care about.. and fixed stuff which was failing for me. Someone building full gnome desktop (I guess koen) should send patches=20 for remaining gnome stuff if needed, before taking this in. Regards, --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --KDt/GgjP6HVcx58l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk6F8y8ACgkQN1Ujt2V2gByC+QCdGmLKY+X+EjiT2wwiwcWllSOM LrQAnRPUBN05PCBfhCrCcfO1Zh7bD50h =f9ZO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KDt/GgjP6HVcx58l--