From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen document day (Oct 12 or 26) Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 02:52:48 +0300 Message-ID: <20110930235247.GY12984@reaktio.net> References: <20110922130618.GA13238@phenom.oracle.com> <20110929141317.GX12984@reaktio.net> <4E85A9B7.7040605@xen.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Florian Heigl Cc: Joseph Glanville , Lars Kurth , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , xen-users@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 06:33:40PM +0200, Florian Heigl wrote: > 2011/9/30 Lars Kurth : > > Let me know, which date you agreed on. We could do a poll. > > We should publish on the blog a bit before. > > Also, how can I help? > > One thing where you could probably help best is setting clear rules > what do document for a release. > i.e. the 4.0 relnotes had build instructions and a lot more, whereas > this is missing in the next release note. > > either the build instructions were in the wrong place for 4.0 or 4.1 > was released with incomplete info ;) > making a checklist sounds *ahem* in place :) > Xen 4.1 releasenotes do state that "check Xen 4.0 releasenotes for build instructions and more info" :) -- Pasi