From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] Add platform driver support to the CS890x driver
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 18:13:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111001171340.GN11710@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGzjT4fkjs7j=a0P=EcPcx-KJpZsMy=cmpYd2STO3Mk8yhoT_Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:01:10AM +0200, Jaccon Bastiaansen wrote:
> Hello Domenico,
>
> 2011/9/28 Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@gmail.com>:
> > Hi Jaccon,
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:52:52PM +0200, Jaccon Bastiaansen wrote:
> >>
> >> Ok, so you would like to see the #ifdefs for the IXDP2351, IXDP2X01,
> >> QQ2440 and MX31ADS in the cs890x driver replaced by platform_device
> >> definitions in the platform specific code of those platforms (in the
> >> same way as I have done for the i.MX21ADS platform)? Is this correct?
> >
> > Feel free to completely dump the QQ2440 thing, the QQ2440 board support
> > is not in mainline and will not until it can be implemented mostly with
> > DT, I guess. ?At that time I will be happy to use your platform device
> > conversion - with the OF initialization that sombody will write ;)
I don't have Domenico's original mail...
The QQ2440 thing got submitted into the patch system while the consolidation
push was going on earlier in the year, so I ignored it (along with the other
platforms which people submitted without regard to Linus' rant.)
It's now up to the SoC maintainers whether they want to accept this stuff,
and if so how to get it into mainline (probably via Arnd) - be that in
their current form or if they think that a DT based implementation is
better.
I'll be discarding the four 'new' platforms (of which QQ2440 is one) which
have been sitting in the patch system since March in the next few days.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-01 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-07 10:22 [PATCH] Add platform driver support to the CS890x driver Jaccon Bastiaansen
2011-09-07 12:50 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-09-10 11:37 ` Jaccon Bastiaansen
2011-09-10 14:12 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-09-11 17:34 ` Jaccon Bastiaansen
2011-09-11 18:53 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-09-12 10:52 ` Jaccon Bastiaansen
2011-09-12 12:30 ` Uwe Kleine-König
[not found] ` <20110928083048.GA15311@glitch.intra.local>
2011-09-30 9:01 ` Jaccon Bastiaansen
2011-10-01 17:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-10-12 14:28 ` Domenico Andreoli
2011-09-13 7:44 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-09-13 7:46 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-09-27 18:27 ` [PATCH V2] " Jaccon Bastiaansen
2011-10-09 20:51 ` Jaccon Bastiaansen
2011-11-03 8:06 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-11-07 12:14 ` Jaccon Bastiaansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111001171340.GN11710@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.