From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen document day (Oct 12 or 26) Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 14:12:16 +0300 Message-ID: <20111002111216.GA12984@reaktio.net> References: <20110922130618.GA13238@phenom.oracle.com> <20110929141317.GX12984@reaktio.net> <4E85A9B7.7040605@xen.org> <20110930235247.GY12984@reaktio.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Florian Heigl Cc: Joseph Glanville , Lars Kurth , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , xen-users@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 08:06:09PM +0200, Florian Heigl wrote: > 2011/10/1 Pasi Kärkkäinen : > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 06:33:40PM +0200, Florian Heigl wrote: > >> 2011/9/30 Lars Kurth : > >> > Let me know, which date you agreed on. We could do a poll. > >> > We should publish on the blog a bit before. > >> > Also, how can I help? > >> > >> One thing where you could probably help best is setting clear rules > >> what do document for a release. > >> i.e. the 4.0 relnotes had build instructions and a lot more, whereas > >> this is missing in the next release note. > >> > >> either the build instructions were in the wrong place for 4.0 or 4.1 > >> was released with incomplete info ;) > >> making a checklist sounds *ahem* in place :) > >> > > > > Xen 4.1 releasenotes do state that "check Xen 4.0 releasenotes for build instructions and more info" :) > > You see how well that worked for me :) > > Imagine a magazine which has half of the standard topics missing on > it's second issue with a pointer to the last one. > And tbh I guess if anyone had re-tested the 4.0 build instructions > line by line and found them 100% working then he'd probably have > copied them over? > Well they ARE working, that's why I didn't copy them when I wrote 4.1 page :-) But anyway, feel free to do that! > Flo > -- > the purpose of libvirt is to provide an abstraction layer hiding all > xen features added since 2006 until they were finally understood and > copied by the kvm devs. :) -- Pasi