From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758099Ab1JEVCE (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2011 17:02:04 -0400 Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:57736 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757872Ab1JEVCB (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2011 17:02:01 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 14:01:56 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Hans Verkuil Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: [RFCv4 PATCH 0/6]: add poll_requested_events() function Message-Id: <20111005140156.70ed0329.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <201110050947.09488.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> References: <1317282252-8290-1-git-send-email-hverkuil@xs4all.nl> <201110050947.09488.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:47:09 +0200 Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Thursday 29 September 2011 09:44:06 Hans Verkuil wrote: > > This is the fourth version of this patch series, incorporating the comments > > from Andrew Morton: I've split up the multiple-assignment line and added a > > comment explaining the purpose of the new function in poll.h. > > > > It's also rebased to the current staging/for_v3.2 branch of the linux-media > > tree. > > > > There are no other changes compared to the RFCv3 patches. > > > > I'd very much like to get an Acked-by (or additional comments) from Al or > > Andrew! This patch series really should go into v3.2 which is getting > > close. > > > > Normally I would have posted this v4 3 weeks ago, but due to Real Life > > interference in the past few weeks I was unable to. But I'm back, and this > > is currently the highest priority for me. > > This is becoming annoying. Andrew, Al, can one of you please Ack this patch or > review it? We *really* need this enhancement for our v4l drivers. I've been > asking for an ack (or review) for ages and for the most part I got radio > silence. Jon Corbet has already reviewed the code in early July (!), so I > don't see why this is taking so long. > > Mauro needs an ack from one of you before he can merge it. > It looks OK to me, but obviously it would be better if Al were to go through it also. If he doesn't then there isn't a lot we can do about it - I suggest that you proceed with the plan to merge it into -rc1.