From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754785Ab1JHAui (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2011 20:50:38 -0400 Received: from peace.netnation.com ([204.174.223.2]:43063 "EHLO peace.netnation.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751049Ab1JHAuh (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2011 20:50:37 -0400 Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 17:50:36 -0700 From: Simon Kirby To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Dave Jones , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: Linux 3.1-rc9 Message-ID: <20111008005035.GC22843@hostway.ca> References: <20111007070842.GA27555@hostway.ca> <20111007174848.GA11011@hostway.ca> <1318010515.398.8.camel@twins> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1318010515.398.8.camel@twins> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 08:01:55PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > @@ -2571,6 +2573,7 @@ void thread_group_cputimer(struct task_struct *tsk, struct task_cputime *times); > static inline void thread_group_cputime_init(struct signal_struct *sig) > { > raw_spin_lock_init(&sig->cputimer.lock); > + raw_spin_lock_init(&sig->cputimer.runtime_lock); My 3.1-rc9 tree has just spin_lock_init() here, not raw_*. Which tree is your patch against? -next or something? It applies with some cooking like this, but will it be right? > sed s/raw_// ../sched-patch-noraw.diff | patch -p1 --dry patching file include/linux/sched.h Hunk #1 succeeded at 503 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 512 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 2568 (offset -5 lines). patching file kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c patching file kernel/sched_stats.h Simon-