All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	Christophe Saout <christophe@saout.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Block regression since 3.1-rc3
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 12:14:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111008161421.GA5743@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANejiEXnXJ7LkyqHyH1S2c4A95Si7v0-gDmRD824r3ROntaDCA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Oct 08 2011 at  7:02am -0400,
Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org> wrote:

> Looks the dm request based flush logic is broken.
> 
> saved_make_request_fn
>   __make_request
>     blk_insert_flush
> but blk_insert_flush doesn't put the original request to list, instead, the
> q->flush_rq is in list.
> then
> dm_request_fn
>   blk_peek_request
>     dm_prep_fn
>       clone_rq
>   map_request
>     blk_insert_cloned_request
> so q->flush_rq is cloned, and get dispatched. but we can't clone q->flush_rq
> and use it to do flush. map_request even could assign a different blockdev to
> the cloned request.

You haven't explained why cloning q->flush_rq is broken.  What is the
problem with map_request changing the blockdev?  For the purposes of
request-based DM the flush machinery has already managed the processing
of the flush at the higher level request_queue.

By the time request-based DM is cloning a flush request it really has no
need to reenter the flush machinery (even though Tejun wants it to --
but in practice it doesn't buy us anything because we never stack
request-based DM at the moment.  Instead it showcases how brittle this
path is).

> Clone q->flush_rq is absolutely wrong.

I'm still missing the _why_.

Taking a step back:

Unless others have an immediate ah-ha moment, I'd suggest we revert
commit 4853abaae7e4a2a (block: fix flush machinery for stacking drivers
with differring flush flags).  Whereby avoiding unnecessarily reentering
the flush machinery.

If commit ed8b752bccf256 (dm table: set flush capability based on
underlying devices) is in place the flush gets fed directly to
scsi_request_fn, which is fine because the request-based DM's
request_queue's flush_flags reflect the flush capabilities of the
underlying device(s).

We are then covered relative to the only request-based DM use-case
people care about (e.g. dm-multipath, which doesn't use stacked
request-based DM).

We can revisit upholding the purity of the flush machinery for stacked
devices in >= 3.2.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-08 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-30 15:51 Block regression since 3.1-rc3 Christophe Saout
2011-09-30 15:51 ` Christophe Saout
2011-09-30 18:02 ` [dm-devel] " Christophe Saout
2011-10-03 14:43 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-10-04 12:02   ` Christophe Saout
2011-10-04 13:32     ` Jeff Moyer
2011-10-04 15:06       ` Christophe Saout
2011-10-06 19:51     ` Jeff Moyer
2011-10-06 22:02       ` Christophe Saout
2011-10-08 11:02       ` Shaohua Li
2011-10-08 12:05         ` Christophe Saout
2011-10-08 12:05           ` Christophe Saout
2011-10-09  4:26           ` Shaohua Li
2011-11-01  4:54           ` illdred
2011-10-08 16:14         ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2011-10-09  4:31           ` Shaohua Li
2011-10-09  7:16             ` Shaohua Li
2011-10-09  7:16               ` Shaohua Li
2011-10-09  8:12               ` Christophe Saout
2011-10-09 13:47                 ` Christophe Saout
2011-10-10 21:33           ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-11 19:56             ` Mike Snitzer
2011-10-11 20:52               ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-11 22:07                 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-10-09  8:08       ` [dm-devel] " Shaohua Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111008161421.GA5743@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=christophe@saout.de \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.