From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [3.1 patch] x86: default to vsyscall=native
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:48:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111010114840.GC17079@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFLxGvx0QMrvG_ZsFE6C_xHn9JpWJ-aW-V=K9pm3OoXZc=NKxQ@mail.gmail.com>
* richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> wrote:
> From UML's point of view the current situation is odd. UML will no
> longer run on top of a default 3.1 kernel.
This needs to be fixed (perhaps worked around in UML if that's
possible and if you agree with that) - or barring a real obvious fix
needs to be reverted to the last-known-working state. We are in -rc9
so nothing but really, really obvious patches can be applied.
> Why is this odd? One of the major reasons why people are still
> using UML is because you can run it as non-privileged user on any
> x86 Linux host. An user which has root privileges can setup and use
> KVM which is much nicer than UML...
No, your complaint is entirely justified.
Andrew?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-10 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-03 9:08 [3.1 patch] x86: default to vsyscall=native Adrian Bunk
2011-10-03 13:04 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-03 17:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2011-10-03 18:06 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-03 18:41 ` Adrian Bunk
2011-10-05 22:13 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-05 22:22 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-10-05 22:30 ` Adrian Bunk
2011-10-05 22:41 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-10-05 22:46 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-05 23:36 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-06 3:06 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-06 12:12 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-10-06 15:37 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-10-06 18:16 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-06 18:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-07 0:48 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-10 11:19 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-10-10 11:48 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-10-10 15:31 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-11 6:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-11 17:24 ` [RFC] fixing the UML failure root cause Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-13 6:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-13 8:40 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-14 4:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-14 6:30 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-14 20:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-21 21:01 ` [PATCH] x86-64: Set siginfo and context on vsyscall emulation faults Andy Lutomirski
2011-10-22 4:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-22 9:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2011-11-08 0:33 ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix and re-enable vsyscall=emulate Andy Lutomirski
2011-11-08 0:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86-64: Set siginfo and context on vsyscall emulation faults Andy Lutomirski
2011-12-05 13:23 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2011-11-08 0:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: Default to vsyscall=emulate Andy Lutomirski
2011-12-05 13:24 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2011-12-02 22:47 ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix and re-enable vsyscall=emulate Andy Lutomirski
2011-12-05 11:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-14 19:53 ` [RFC] fixing the UML failure root cause richard -rw- weinberger
2011-10-14 20:17 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-14 20:23 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-10-14 20:31 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-10-14 20:39 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-10-14 22:28 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-10-15 16:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-05 22:24 ` [3.1 patch] x86: default to vsyscall=native Adrian Bunk
2011-10-03 13:19 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-10-03 17:46 ` Adrian Bunk
2011-10-05 21:40 Adrian Bunk
2011-10-05 22:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-09 13:45 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111010114840.GC17079@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@mit.edu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=richard.weinberger@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.