From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Xen document day (Oct 12 or 26)
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:04:04 -0400
Message-ID: <20111010160404.GB28646@phenom.oracle.com>
References: <20110922130618.GA13238@phenom.oracle.com>
	<20110929141317.GX12984@reaktio.net>
	<CAOzFzEieWhgoBWEXQFjqr8PYoVOAcU20rtA2Q3OhyA+=dD9Atg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E85A9B7.7040605@xen.org>
	<20111003185309.GC15608@phenom.oracle.com>
	<4E92D809.9000504@xen.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4E92D809.9000504@xen.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xen.org>
Cc: Joseph Glanville <joseph.glanville@orionvm.com.au>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, xen-users@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:33:29PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote:
> Looks like me being maxed out means we are too close to Oct 12th
> now. Does anybody object to doing this on the 26th?

I am OK.
> 
> How long will the day be? An afternoon? A whole day with rolling
> time-zones?

One day. As much as people can do I would think.

> 
> > In lots of ways. There is a lot of things that we want to do - but
> I don't think we can do
> > _all_ of them. Can you help us determine what ought to have a
> higher priority?
> In a nutshell:
> - We should focus on some of the shortfalls we identified at the Hackathon
>   (CLI guides, man pages, etc.)?
> - We should also do a quick Wiki sanity check (i.e. identify
> important pages, which are wrong)
>   I can help guide this
> 
> Maybe we can split into two groups

<nods>