From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tim Deegan Subject: Re: nested xen on domU? Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:37:56 +0100 Message-ID: <20111020093756.GA49983@ocelot.phlegethon.org> References: <3DDB718A-0E09-486A-810D-05DF7D790C22@gmail.com> <20111011081221.GA88076@ocelot.phlegethon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111011081221.GA88076@ocelot.phlegethon.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: AP Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Eddie Dong , Jun Nakajima , Hyo J Lee List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org At 09:12 +0100 on 11 Oct (1318324341), Tim Deegan wrote: > At 14:35 -0700 on 10 Oct (1318257332), AP wrote: > > On Oct 9, 2011 9:11 AM, "Hyo J Lee" wrote: > > > > > > Hi all > > > > > > I wonder if there's any way that I can do nested xen on domU not dom0. > > > This is what I plan. > > > > > > | dom0_T| |domU1_T| |domU2_T| > > > ----------------------------- (domU1_B) > > > |dom0_B| | xen top | > > > ----------------------------------------- > > > | xen bottom | > > > > > > > I tried this recently on an Intel platform and was unable to bring up > > DomU1_T. The bios screen wouldn't come up. Do let me know if you have better > > luck. > > ISTR that the last time I tried it I ended up using KVM as the nested > hypervisor (for other reasons). > > Cc'ing the author and maintainer of the Intel nested-HVM code. > > Eddie, can you help please? Is this meant to work? Ping? Eddie? Jun? Anyone? Tim.