From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from bsmtp4.bon.at ([195.3.86.186]:25520 "EHLO bsmtp.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751805Ab1JUTD2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:03:28 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:03:56 +0200 From: Clemens Buchacher To: Adrian Chadd Cc: Mohammed Shafi , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath9k-devel Subject: Re: ath9k: irq storm after suspend/resume Message-ID: <20111021190356.GA26832@ecki.lan> (sfid-20111021_210332_007311_E3DD9D22) References: <20111005062528.GA1403@ecki> <20111015093902.GA23520@ecki> <20111018064459.GA1442@ecki> <20111021102221.GA1463@ecki.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:10:21PM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > If the interrupt storm continue occuring, try putting the whole NIC to > sleep entirely (ie, call pcipowersave to put the NIC to sleep, then > make sure the NIC -stays- asleep somehow, ie so nothing else tries > waking it up. Is it possible to figure out whether or not it is asleep in the interrupt routine? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Clemens Buchacher Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:03:56 +0200 Subject: [ath9k-devel] ath9k: irq storm after suspend/resume In-Reply-To: References: <20111005062528.GA1403@ecki> <20111015093902.GA23520@ecki> <20111018064459.GA1442@ecki> <20111021102221.GA1463@ecki.lan> Message-ID: <20111021190356.GA26832@ecki.lan> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:10:21PM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > If the interrupt storm continue occuring, try putting the whole NIC to > sleep entirely (ie, call pcipowersave to put the NIC to sleep, then > make sure the NIC -stays- asleep somehow, ie so nothing else tries > waking it up. Is it possible to figure out whether or not it is asleep in the interrupt routine?