From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753026Ab1KBWK3 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 2 Nov 2011 18:10:29 -0400
Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.124]:55470 "EHLO
	hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751870Ab1KBWK1 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 2 Nov 2011 18:10:27 -0400
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=PzmnriOiyqYdyw8suerSEFMr8oy2Ua58JL+Rk7iuDKE= c=1 sm=0 a=wom5GMh1gUkA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:17 a=HrKklt6QmJN0OufAPDIA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=ZycB6UtQUfgMyuk2+PxD7w==:117
X-Cloudmark-Score: 0
X-Originating-IP: 74.67.80.29
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 18:10:23 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Simon Kirby <sim@hostway.ca>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
        Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.1-rc9
Message-ID: <20111102221023.GA27457@home.goodmis.org>
References: <CA+55aFwCBy=4YK6amE=H-BYu9-boj4Po2Zkgf4V261mCx0DC4A@mail.gmail.com>
 <1318879396.4172.92.camel@twins>
 <alpine.LFD.2.02.1110172237030.3240@ionos>
 <alpine.LFD.2.02.1110181037120.3240@ionos>
 <1318928713.21167.4.camel@twins>
 <20111018182046.GF1309@hostway.ca>
 <alpine.LFD.2.02.1110182146440.3240@ionos>
 <20111024190203.GA24410@hostway.ca>
 <20111025202049.GB25043@hostway.ca>
 <20111031173246.GA10614@hostway.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20111031173246.GA10614@hostway.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Thomas pointed me here.

On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:32:46AM -0700, Simon Kirby wrote:
> [104661.244767] 
> [104661.244767]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> [104661.244767]        
> [104661.244767]        CPU0                    CPU1
> [104661.244767]        ----                    ----
> [104661.244767]   lock(slock-AF_INET);
> [104661.244767]                                lock(slock-AF_INET);
> [104661.244767]                                lock(slock-AF_INET);
> [104661.244767]   lock(slock-AF_INET);
> [104661.244767] 
> [104661.244767]  *** DEADLOCK ***
> [104661.244767] 

Bah, I used the __print_lock_name() function to show the lock names in
the above, which leaves off the subclass number. I'll go write up a
patch that fixes that.

Thanks,

-- Steve