From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: nonlocal_bind and IPv6 Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 02:06:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20111216.020600.1695776769736304587.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1323879648-419-1-git-send-email-bernat@luffy.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: zenczykowski@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org To: bernat@luffy.cx Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:47976 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756067Ab1LPHIN convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2011 02:08:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =46rom: Vincent Bernat Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 07:24:04 +0100 > OoO En ce milieu de nuit =E9toil=E9e du vendredi 16 d=E9cembre 2= 011, vers > 04:58, Maciej =AFenczykowski disait=A0: >=20 >> why not simply use the IP_TRANSPARENT or IP_FREEBIND socket options? >=20 > Because this requires modifying each affected software. This can= be > difficult if you don't have the source code available. But it means that it would work on every single kernel verion out there.