From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756700Ab1LWKz5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Dec 2011 05:55:57 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:43021 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754069Ab1LWKzz (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Dec 2011 05:55:55 -0500 Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:53:57 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Joerg Roedel Cc: Avi Kivity , Robert Richter , Benjamin Block , Hans Rosenfeld , hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, eranian@google.com, brgerst@gmail.com, Andreas.Herrmann3@amd.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin Block , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RFC 4/5] x86, perf: implements lwp-perf-integration (rc1) Message-ID: <20111223105357.GG4749@elte.hu> References: <20111220091511.GB3091@elte.hu> <4EF05996.8030807@redhat.com> <20111220100916.GA20788@elte.hu> <20111220152758.GA30127@8bytes.org> <20111220184004.GE8408@elte.hu> <20111221000716.GB30127@8bytes.org> <20111221123442.GB6071@elte.hu> <4EF1D4B6.3020408@redhat.com> <20111221132233.GB31186@elte.hu> <20111221224900.GD30127@8bytes.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111221224900.GD30127@8bytes.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.3.1 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 02:22:33PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Avi Kivity wrote: > > > I hate to re-enter this thread, but this "niche use case" is > > > exactly what LWP is designed for. [...] > > > > It's not the only usecase that it can be used in, and that is > > what matters to me. > > The really sad thing about it is, that this only matters to > you. [...] What the hell are you talking about? Precise, skid-free profiles matter to pretty much *every* single developer profiling user-space code on AMD CPUs. That you are not representing them properly in this thread qualifies you, not me. Thanks, Ingo