From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 17:05:05 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] Possible Denx m28evk ethernet problem + solution In-Reply-To: <4D2946FA-39DE-4AB8-9F22-DDE8562159A0@delien.nl> References: <3C18F794-D414-406A-BEA4-ABE59990B5BF@Delien.nl> <201201081151.30796.marek.vasut@gmail.com> <4D2946FA-39DE-4AB8-9F22-DDE8562159A0@delien.nl> Message-ID: <201201081705.05747.marek.vasut@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > > Not really ... that's how it all works. When Stefano sends pull RQ, it'll > > go mainline. > > Aha, so it's not mainline yet after all ;-) But I get it; It's available in > Fabio's repo and will be in Denx mainline soon. Stefano's ... but it's almost mainline, for imx development, that's what you should use anyway. > > > I see no problems with the board DRAM detection on our board, no. I > > tested this quite thoroughly. > > > > I don't see the registers differ either ... ever. I suspect your problem > > is with your DRAM configuration data -- if your DRAM chip is > > misconfigured, you'll get such memory problems. > > It works beautifully; I have no reason to assume there's anything wrong > with it. When it detects 0 MiB SDRAM, it's been my own fault so far: > Obscure reset scenarios, incremental builds where a clean build was due, > etc. Can you pinpoint the problem ? Your description is quite vague ... > > > RFC/patch is always welcome. > > Great. I'll see what I can come up with. > > > MX28EVK has no NAND if I understand it correctly. > > It has one of these beautiful TSOP-48 footprint compatible ZIF sockets on > board. Standard it's empty, but with a Samsung K9G08UOM in it, it worked > out-of-the-box using your m28evk configuration. Muhehe, of course ... the code is state-of-the-art top-notch thing :-D > However mx28evk NAND is mutually exclusive with the use of MMC1 socket > because of shared pins. So in my config, CMD_NAND is used to configure in > NAND and to configure out MMC1. > > > Make a patch and submit to the mailing list, like everyone else does > > please. Don't try to reinvent wheel ... square one this time even. > > It's hardly worth a patch; Perhaps Fabio already typed his own. But I'll > submit one tomorrow anyway. Please do, thanks M > > Robert.