From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: OMAP34xx Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 20:04:45 +0000 Message-ID: <20120205200445.GJ17309@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20120204185453.GB17309@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120204190109.GL20333@atomide.com> <20120204203453.GD17309@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120205125626.GA11372@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120205143824.GA12577@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120205174036.GT20333@atomide.com> <20120205180521.GG17309@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120205184931.GM1426@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:47563 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750970Ab2BEUE6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Feb 2012 15:04:58 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120205184931.GM1426@atomide.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: Kevin Hilman , Tomi Valkeinen , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 10:49:31AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Then let's have separate clean-up related patches, even if we merge > them too during the -rc cycle. You've probably done this already in > your series, but I have not seen the series yet. Actually I don't - what I have is that single (and growing) patch which you've seen at the moment. Once I'm happy that it's in a reasonable state, I'll then see about splitting it up.