From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [net-next 10/11] e1000e: fix sparse warnings with -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__ Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:16:33 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20120207.121633.43514871391885371.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1328618038-5008-11-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, bruce.w.allan@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, gospo@redhat.com, sassmann@redhat.com To: David.Laight@ACULAB.COM Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:34817 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755661Ab2BGRQm (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2012 12:16:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: "David Laight" Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 12:58:35 -0000 > >> for (i = 0; i < last_word - first_word + 1; i++) >> - eeprom_buff[i] = cpu_to_le16(eeprom_buff[i]); >> + cpu_to_le16s(&eeprom_buff[i]); > > The old version is likely to generate much better code. Not on cpus that have swap-endian loads and stores.